← 論文一覧に戻る

Sustainable Urban Policies Through Zero Waste and Circular Economy Strategies: An Integrated Framework from International Climate Commitments to Local Action

廃棄物ゼロと循環経済戦略による持続可能な都市政策:国際気候公約から地域行動への統合フレームワーク (AI 翻訳)

Dr. Özge TENLİK

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-26#circular_economyOrigin: Global対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20920039
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20920039

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、廃棄物ゼロと循環経済戦略を都市の気候政策に組み込むための統合的フレームワークを提示する。定性レビューにより、国際公約(パリ協定、SDGs)と地域行動のギャップを埋めるための多層ガバナンス、革新的資金調達、データ基盤の重要性を指摘。先進国と途上国の非対称性を踏まえた異なる政策処方箋を提唱する。

English

This paper proposes an integrated framework for embedding zero waste and circular economy strategies into sustainable urban climate policies. Through a qualitative review, it highlights multi-level governance, innovative financing, and robust data infrastructure as key enablers to bridge international commitments (Paris Agreement, SDGs) and local action. It advocates differentiated policy prescriptions accounting for asymmetries between developed and developing economies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では循環経済への移行が地域脱炭素ロードマップと連動しつつある。本フレームワークは、自治体が国際公約を具体策に落とし込む際のガバナンス・資金調達・データ整備の課題を整理しており、日本のグリーン成長戦略や地域循環共生圏の設計に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

The framework aligns with global trends under the Paris Agreement and SDGs, emphasizing the role of cities. It offers a structured approach for municipal climate action that complements national policies and international disclosure frameworks like CDP and ICLEI.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive synthesis of governance theory and municipal practice for scholars of urban climate transitions and circular economy.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a staged implementation roadmap and policy instruments for city sustainability officers designing circular economy strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights structural barriers and differentiated approaches needed for localizing international climate commitments.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The governance of the urban climate transition increasingly demands integrated policy architectures capable of connecting binding international climate commitments with the concrete operational capacities of municipal authorities. This article advances the argument that zero waste and circular economy strategies, when embedded within coherent sustainable urban policies, constitute one of the most tractable and scalable instruments available to cities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving resource productivity, and strengthening systemic resilience. Adopting a qualitative integrative review of a defined and verified reference corpus, supplemented by foundational scholarship in circular economy theory and urban climate governance, the study synthesizes governance theory, international frameworks, and documented municipal practice into a single analytical framework. The analysis demonstrates that municipalities are uniquely positioned to translate the obligations arising from the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals into measurable reductions in emissions and material intensity, provided that multi-level governance, innovative financing, and robust data infrastructures are established in concert. The study further establishes that the persistence of structural barriers, notably financing deficits, governance fragmentation, and inadequate measurement systems, continues to constrain implementation, and that the contextual asymmetries between developed and developing economies require differentiated rather than uniform policy prescriptions. By integrating policy instruments, comparative regional evidence, case-based insights, and staged implementation roadmaps, the article offers a comprehensive and practically oriented framework intended to inform both scholarship and municipal decision-making.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。