gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

EMISSION IMPOSSIBLE: BALANCING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS AND ENERGY PRICES

排出は不可能か:環境配慮とエネルギー価格のバランス (AI 翻訳)

Rene Aid, Maria Arduca, Sara Biagini, Luca Taschini

International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-06#炭素価格Origin: Global
DOI: 10.1142/s0219024926500044
原典: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024926500044

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、炭素価格政策が国内エネルギー生産者価格に与える影響を理論的に分析し、ネットゼロ達成に伴う政策主導の価格影響を定量化する。排出規制下のエネルギー企業の行動をモデル化し、排出削減とエネルギー価格安定の両目標を考慮した最適な排出枠配分を導出。分析の結果、排出削減目標を軽視するコストは、エネルギー価格抑制の利益を上回ることが示され、排出削減目標の優先が不可欠と結論づける。

English

This paper develops a theoretical framework to analyze how carbon pricing policies affect domestic energy producer prices and quantify the policy-driven price impacts of achieving net-zero emissions. It models energy firms' behavior under emission caps and derives the optimal allocation of allowances when regulators balance emission reduction and energy price stability. The analysis shows that the costs of missing emissions goals outweigh any benefits from marginally lower energy prices, underscoring that emission reduction must remain the primary focus.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では2023年度から段階的に導入された炭素価格(GXリーグ、有償オークション)が、エネルギー価格に与える影響が政策課題となっている。本論文は、排出削減と価格安定のトレードオフを理論的に整理し、日本の政策設計(特にGX推進法に基づく排出量取引制度)に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As carbon pricing expands globally (EU ETS, China ETS, etc.), policymakers face the challenge of balancing emission reductions with energy price stability. This paper provides a rigorous theoretical framework to quantify trade-offs, offering insights for designing carbon pricing mechanisms that maintain political feasibility while achieving climate goals.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a formal model linking carbon pricing, firm abatement, and energy prices, useful for further empirical or theoretical work on policy design.

🏢実務担当者:Helps corporate sustainability teams understand how carbon pricing may affect energy costs and the importance of advocating for ambitious targets.

🏛政策担当者:Offers clear evidence that prioritizing emission reduction is optimal even when energy price concerns are significant, guiding carbon pricing design.

📄 Abstract(原文)

In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework to examine how carbon pricing policies affect domestic energy producer prices and to quantify the policy-driven price impacts of achieving net-zero emissions. Energy-producing firms comply with emission caps by adjusting production, undertaking abatement, or purchasing permits, and these strategies determine both emissions reductions and outcomes in the energy producer price index. We first model an emissions-regulated energy sector and solve for the market equilibrium under a dynamic allocation of allowances set by the regulator. We then extend the framework to a regulator that balances emission reduction and energy price stability objectives, identifying the optimal allocation when both environmental and domestic energy price concerns are considered. The analysis shows how varying the penalties assigned to deviations from targets allows regulators to calibrate policy priorities. Under reasonable parameterizations, even when substantial weight is placed on limiting energy price increases or when emissions reduction targets are downplayed, the costs of missing emissions goals outweigh any benefits from marginally lower energy producer prices. Our results underscore that emission reduction objectives must remain the primary focus for policymakers.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

    gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。