gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Green Chemistry Approaches to Carbon Capture and Utilisation: Transforming Industrial Emissions into Value-Added Products and Community Well-Being

二酸化炭素回収・有効利用（CCU）におけるグリーンケミストリーアプローチ：産業排出物の高付加価値製品への転換と地域社会の福祉 (AI 翻訳)

Oluwakemi Jumoke Bello, Raphael Igbarumah Ayo Daniel, Olabanke Florence Olawuyi, Babajide David Makanjuola and Claret Chinenyenwa Analikwu

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-10#CCUS
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20107745
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20107745

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、2019～2026年のエビデンスに基づき、CCU（二酸化炭素回収・有効利用）におけるグリーンケミストリーのアプローチを包括的に分析。アミン吸収、膜分離、光触媒還元、電気化学的還元、バイオ固定化、鉱物炭酸塩化などの技術を比較し、メタノール、合成ガス、尿素等の製品への転換を評価する。さらに、プロセス安全性、太陽光駆動型システム、ライフサイクル評価に基づく公平性、地域住民の健康便益（大気質改善、雇用創出）を定量化。炭素価格や社会的ライフサイクル評価を組み込んだ統合的ガバナンス枠組みを提案し、技術偏重のリスクと公正な移行の重要性を強調する。

English

This review synthesizes 2019-2026 evidence on green chemistry approaches to carbon capture and utilisation (CCU), comparing capture technologies (amine absorption, membranes, ionic liquids) and conversion pathways (photocatalytic, electrochemical, biological, mineral carbonation). It evaluates downstream products such as methanol, syngas, and urea, and integrates health equity, process safety, and solar-driven systems. Community co-benefits including air quality improvement and green jobs are quantified. The authors propose a governance framework embedding carbon pricing, social life cycle assessment, and just transition principles, warning against technocratic solutions that externalize harms to vulnerable populations.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本論文は日本固有の文脈ではないが、CCU技術の社会的受容性や公正な移行の視点は、日本のGX政策（グリーンイノベーション基金、カーボンリサイクル技術の社会実装）にも示唆を与える。特に、ライフサイクル思考と健康影響評価は、日本の地域コミュニティとの協働において有用である。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global GX discourse by embedding community well-being and health equity into CCU governance, a dimension often overlooked in techno-economic analyses. Its integrated framework combining carbon pricing, social LCA, and just transition principles aligns with ISSB's social disclosure requirements and CSRD's double materiality. The emphasis on energy penalties and material circularity also informs emerging UK and EU CCU regulations.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive literature synthesis linking CCU technologies with health and equity outcomes, identifying research gaps in social life cycle assessment for CO2 conversion pathways.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a framework for evaluating CCU projects that includes community health indicators and just transition metrics, useful for corporate sustainability teams designing CCS/CCU initiatives.

🏛政策担当者:Proposes governance mechanisms integrating carbon pricing, health impact assessments, and equity metrics, relevant for shaping national CCU strategies and regulatory frameworks.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Abstract Cite This Paper: Oluwakemi Jumoke Bello, Raphael Igbarumah Ayo Daniel Olabanke Florence Olawuyi, Babajide David Makanjuola and Claret Chinenyenwa Analikwu (2026). "Green Chemistry Approaches to Carbon Capture and Utilisation: Transforming Industrial Emissions into Value-Added Products and Community Well-Being". AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CITY AND SOCIETY (AJSCS), vol. 16, Issue 3, 2026, pp. 3/1-3/18. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20107746 Anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions continue to drive climate change, air pollution, and respiratory disease burdens in industrialised and rapidly industrialising regions. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) offers a dual-benefit pathway: mitigating greenhouse gas concentrations while converting CO₂ into economically valuable products. This review synthesises 2019–2026 evidence on green chemistry approaches to CCU, examining capture technologies (amine absorption, solid adsorption, membrane separation, ionic liquids), conversion processes (photocatalytic reduction, electrochemical CO₂ reduction, biological fixation, mineral carbonation), and downstream products (methanol, syngas, carbonates, urea, and synthetic fuels). We analyse the health-informed process safety frameworks required to protect communities near industrial facilities, the solar-driven photocatalytic systems that enable renewable-energy-powered conversion, and the equity-centred life cycle assessments that evaluate supply-chain justice. Community well-being co-benefits—including improved air quality, reduced respiratory morbidity, green job creation, and agricultural productivity gains—are quantified across deployment pathways. Drawing on 100 peer-reviewed sources, we propose an integrated CCU governance framework embedding carbon pricing, social life cycle assessment, and health equity metrics. Without deliberate attention to energy penalties, material circularity, and just transition principles, CCU risks becoming an technocratic exercise that externalises harms to vulnerable populations. Keywords: carbon capture and utilisation, green chemistry, CO₂ conversion, photocatalysis, electrochemical reduction, mineral carbonation, community well-being, life cycle assessment, process safety, health equity, climate resilience

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。