Benchmarking Sustainability-Oriented Green Transition Performance in OECD Countries: A CRITIC-ARAS Framework for SDG-Based Policy Assessment
OECD諸国における持続可能性志向のグリーン移行パフォーマンスのベンチマーキング：SDGsに基づく政策評価のためのCRITIC-ARASフレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
Mustafa Terzioğlu, Neylan Kaya, Aslihan Bozcuk, Burçin Tutcu, Günay Deniz Dursun, Güler Ferhan Ünal Uyar, Güray Tonguç
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
2023年のOECD31カ国データを用い、再生可能エネルギー、環境イノベーション、炭素効率、財政手段、化石燃料依存度など8指標をCRITIC-ARAS統合MCDMで評価。スロベニア、アイスランド、ノルウェーが最上位。航空輸送CO2排出が最重要基準。政策面では再生可能エネルギー拡大、環境税、輸送脱炭素、環境R&D支援、化石燃料補助金改革を提言。
English
Using 2023 data from 31 OECD countries, this study applies an integrated CRITIC-ARAS multi-criteria framework to benchmark green transition performance across eight sustainability indicators. Slovenia, Iceland, and Norway rank highest, with air transport CO2 emissions as the most influential criterion. Findings highlight the need for coordinated policies on renewables, environmental taxation, transport decarbonization, and fossil fuel subsidy reform.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はOECD加盟国として、SSBJ開示やGX推進政策の文脈で、国際比較における自国の位置づけを把握する参考となる。特に再生可能エネルギー比率や環境税制の国際比較は、日本のGX戦略の課題を浮き彫りにする。
In the global GX context
This cross-country benchmarking provides a policy-oriented framework relevant to global sustainability assessment, complementing TCFD/ISSB disclosure efforts by offering a macro-level view of transition performance. It underscores the importance of integrating energy, innovation, and fiscal policies for effective decarbonization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative MCDM framework for assessing national green transition performance, useful for sustainability assessment research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers benchmarking insights for corporate sustainability teams to understand country-level policy contexts affecting operations.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights policy levers such as renewable expansion, environmental taxation, and fossil fuel subsidy reform for national decarbonization strategies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires countries to simultaneously advance renewable energy transitions, environmental innovation, carbon efficiency, and sustainable governance mechanisms. Although previous research has extensively examined sustainability transitions and environmental sustainability, comparative assessments integrating renewable energy, environmental innovation, carbon efficiency, fiscal instruments, and fossil fuel dependency remain limited. Using 2023 data from 31 OECD countries, the study analyzes eight sustainability-related indicators through an integrated CRITIC-ARAS multi-criteria decision-making framework. The CRITIC method is employed to determine objective criterion weights, while the ARAS method evaluates countries’ performance relative to an ideal sustainability profile. The findings reveal considerable differences in sustainability performance across OECD countries. CO2 emissions from air transport per capita emerge as the most influential criterion within the weighting structure. According to the results, Slovenia, Iceland, and Norway demonstrate the strongest transition performance. Countries with higher renewable electricity generation, stronger environmental innovation support, lower transport-related emissions, and lower fossil fuel dependency generally achieve better outcomes. Sensitivity analysis supports the overall stability of the ranking structure under alternative weighting scenarios, although the exclusion of the highest-weighted criterion produces noticeable ranking shifts for some countries. The results indicate that sustainability performance depends not only on environmental outcomes but also on countries’ ability to coordinate renewable energy policies, environmental innovation, fiscal instruments, and decarbonization strategies. From a policy perspective, the findings emphasize the importance of renewable energy expansion, environmental taxation, transport decarbonization, environmental R&D support, and fossil fuel subsidy reform for strengthening long-term sustainable development strategies. This study contributes to the sustainability assessment literature by providing a comparative and policy-oriented framework for benchmarking sustainability-oriented green transition performance across countries through integrated environmental, energy-related, and innovation-based indicators.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147019first seen 2026-07-31 05:18:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。