MANAGING THE TRANSFORMATION OF EVERYDAY PRACTICES TO REDUCE THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF HOUSEHOLDS: A SOCIOTECHNICAL APPROACH
家庭の炭素フットプリント削減のための日常的実践の変革管理：社会技術的アプローチ (AI 翻訳)
Olga V. Zakharova
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、家庭の社会的実践の変革を管理し炭素フットプリントを削減するための政策メカニズムを検討する。個人の行動ではなく集団的で物質的に埋め込まれたルーティンに焦点を当てる非効率性を指摘し、社会技術的理論と実践理論を用いて効果的な介入手段を特定する。ロシアの事例研究から、断片的な介入は失敗し、インフラ、スキル、文化的意味への同期した介入が必要であることを示す。
English
This study examines policy mechanisms to manage the transformation of household social practices to reduce carbon footprint. It critiques the focus on individual behavior and highlights the inefficiency of neglecting collective, materially embedded routines. Using sociotechnical and social practice theories, it tests three hypotheses and conducts a case study of the 'Tyumen Ecological Association' in Russia. Findings show that fragmented interventions fail; synchronous interventions targeting infrastructure, skills, and cultural meanings are necessary.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の家庭部門の排出削減政策では、個人の行動変容に偏りがちだが、本論文は集団的実践と制度インフラの統合的介入の重要性を示す。SSBJやカーボンフットプリント表示の普及にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global climate policy by applying sociotechnical transitions theory to household carbon footprint reduction. It offers a framework for integrating practice elements (materials, competences, meanings) with the Multi-Level Perspective, relevant for countries like the EU, US, and Japan seeking to move beyond individual behavior change.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers in sustainability transitions and social practice theory will find the integrative framework and case study valuable for policy design.
🏢実務担当者:Local government and community organizations can use the recommendations to design integrated intervention packages for household emissions reduction.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note the shift from individual to collective practices and the need for synchronous infrastructure, skill, and cultural interventions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines approaches to managing the transformation of household social practices to reduce their carbon footprint. It addresses the inefficiency of policy focusing on individual behavior while ignoring collective, materially embedded routines as a key emissions source. The aim is to identify effective policy mechanisms using socio-technical and social practice theories. Three hypotheses are tested: 1) managing collective practices is more effective than targeting individuals; 2) changing practices as systems requires overcoming socio-technical regime inertia; 3) practice elements (materials, competences, meanings) are key governance entry points. The methodology involves theoretical analysis, synthesis of literature, review of Russian strategic documents, and an in-depth case study of «Tyumen Ecological Association». Data from academic publications, legal acts, and company materials were processed via thematic analysis and conceptualization. The study reveals the traditional hierarchical model of Russian climate policy neglects the population as an active actor. Transforming practices requires synchronous interventions targeting infrastructure, skills, and cultural meanings. The case study shows fragmented interventions (e.g., «Eco-Houses») fail without integration into core operations. The knowledge contribution is the systematization of intervention mechanisms for each practice element and an integrative approach combining the three-element model with the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP). Practical significance lies in recommendations for authorities: shift focus to collective practices, implement integrated intervention packages, and establish public participation institutions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2026-0-2-126-152first seen 2026-06-24 04:59:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。