China’s blue carbon governance for sustainable development: ecological differentiation, policy architecture, and implementation pathways
中国のブルーカーボンガバナンスと持続可能な開発: 生態的差別化、政策アーキテクチャ、実施経路 (AI 翻訳)
Yan Zheng, Hefeng Wang, Yangyi Ai, Yuanjun Wang, J Zhang, Jiarui Li
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、中国のブルーカーボンガバナンスを生態的差別化、政策アーキテクチャ、実施経路の観点から分析。国家排出削減制度（CCER）に基づく修復プロジェクトの認証枠組みが最も強固である一方、生態系間の差別化や広範なガバナンスチェーンの不備を指摘。市場メカニズムと公共補償の調整不足や地域パイロットの経験を全国ルールに転換する必要性を強調する。
English
This paper examines China's blue carbon governance, focusing on the ecology-policy interface. It finds that national crediting is strongest for restoration projects under the CCER system, but governance gaps remain: ecosystems are treated uniformly despite different carbon stocks and MRV burdens, resource rights are weakly connected, and market instruments are not well coordinated with public finance. The authors propose a layered governance approach distinguishing ecosystem types and linking revenues to stewardship.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもJ-ブルーカーボン事業が進む中、中国のCCER制度を通じたブルーカーボン・ガバナンスの分析は、日本における炭素クレジット制度設計や生態系保全と市場メカニズムの統合に示唆を与える。特に生態系の差別化やMRVの階層化、地域パイロットから全国ルールへの転換プロセスは、日本の制度整備に参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper advances the global understanding of blue carbon governance by examining China's evolving policy architecture. It provides a rare integrated analysis of ecological differentiation, carbon market design (CCER), and institutional coordination, offering lessons for countries developing their own blue carbon crediting and coastal restoration programs.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive framework linking ecological differentiation, carbon crediting rules, and governance gaps in China’s blue carbon policy.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for layered MRV systems and benefit-sharing mechanisms when designing blue carbon projects under carbon crediting schemes like CCER.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence on how to align carbon market instruments with public compensation and community stewardship, and how to scale pilot projects into national rules.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Blue carbon ecosystems—mangroves, salt marshes, and seagrass beds—sit at the intersection of climate mitigation, coastal adaptation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development. In China, blue carbon has moved rapidly from scientific concept to policy agenda through carbon peaking policy, marine ecological restoration, and the reactivated national voluntary greenhouse gas emission reduction market. Yet blue carbon governance remains institutionally fragile. Existing debates often discuss resource potential, project methodologies, market design, and policy texts separately. This leaves the ecology–policy interface underexamined. Drawing on national policy and planning documents issued between 2021 and April 2026, official project methodology and market rules, peer-reviewed literature, and reported pilot practice, this article examines how ecological differences, institutional rules, project mechanisms, and sustainable development claims interact in China’s blue carbon governance. The analysis shows that current national crediting arrangements are strongest for restoration interventions entering the China Certified Emission Reductions (CCER) system. The broader governance chain remains incomplete. Ecologically distinct systems are still often treated as a single governance object, although national estimates, CCER methodology parameters, and project cost evidence show clear differences in carbon stocks, soil carbon accumulation, monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) burden, and reversal risk. Resource rights, project development rights, carbon revenues, and stewardship duties remain weakly connected. Market instruments are only partly coordinated with public compensation and blended finance, and local pilots are generating projects faster than reusable rules. A stronger governance approach should distinguish among ecosystem types and action categories. It should build a layered MRV system, link revenues to long-term stewardship and local or community benefit sharing arrangements, and create a route for converting pilot experience into cross-regional rules.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1859402first seen 2026-06-05 05:20:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。