← 論文一覧に戻る

アルゴリズム的権力と気候外交:パキスタンの地球規模気候ガバナンスにおける人工知能の影響評価

Algorithmic Power and Climate Diplomacy: Assessing the Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Pakistan in Global Climate Governance (原題)

Samrana Afzal, Rimsha Kanwal, Habibullah, Muhammad Abdullah

Journal of Business Insight and Innovation📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-26#AI×ESG
DOI: 10.63544/jbii.v5i5.180
原典: https://insightfuljournals.com/index.php/JBII/article/download/180/296
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は「アルゴリズム的権力」概念を導入し、AIがパキスタンの気候外交に与える影響を分析。データ・分析・外交の3容量から構成される枠組みを提案し、アルゴリズム準備指数(ARI)等の合成指標を用いてパキスタンの限定的な準備状況を評価。政策文書の質的分析から、AIへの明示的言及が少なく、データ駆動型気候レジームでの長期的影響力には投資と国際協力が必要と結論。

English

This study introduces 'algorithmic power' to assess AI's implications for Pakistan's climate diplomacy. Proposing a framework of data, analytical, and diplomatic capacities, it uses composite indices (ARI, DLR, AIS) to estimate Pakistan's limited readiness and modest influence. Qualitative analysis of policy documents reveals scarce AI references, concluding that long-term influence requires investments in data systems, AI literacy, and international digital cooperation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ開示やGX政策が進むが、途上国の気候交渉力とAIの関係は新興テーマ。日本企業の海外展開や国際交渉戦略に示唆を与え、データ基盤整備の重要性を再認識させる。

In the global GX context

Globally, this paper contributes to the emerging discourse on AI and climate governance, highlighting how data infrastructure shapes negotiation leverage. It offers a framework applicable to developing countries, complementing ISSB/TCFD disclosure discussions by emphasizing the role of AI readiness in climate diplomacy.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:AIと気候外交の交差領域の理論枠組みと指標化の試みとして有用。

🏢実務担当者:途上国での気候データ整備やAI活用の投資判断に示唆。

🏛政策担当者:気候交渉におけるデジタル格差と国際協力の政策立案に参考。

📄 Abstract(原文)

This study examines the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for Pakistan’s role in global climate governance by introducing the concept of “algorithmic power.” Traditional climate diplomacy relies on economic size, technical expertise, and alliance networks, yet overlooks how data infrastructure and AI tools reshape negotiation leverage. We propose a framework comprising three dimensions Data Capacity, Analytical Capacity, and Diplomatic Capacity operationalized through three composite indices: Algorithmic Readiness Index (ARI), Diplomatic Leverage Ratio (DLR), and Algorithmic Influence Score (AIS). Using hypothetical scores calibrated against regional benchmarks, Pakistan’s ARI is estimated at 0.40, indicating limited algorithmic readiness, while its DLR of 1.25 suggests relatively effective conversion of this readiness into diplomatic influence. However, the overall AIS of 0.50 reveals modest aggregate influence, underscoring structural constraints in data and analytical capacities. Qualitative analysis of Pakistan’s climate policy documents and UNFCCC submissions shows limited explicit reference to AI, reliance on traditional indicators, and emerging but underdeveloped awareness of digital tools. The findings highlight that while diplomatic initiative and coalition-building can partially offset algorithmic weaknesses, long-term influence in an increasingly data-driven climate regime requires targeted investments in climate data systems, AI literacy, modelling institutions, and equitable international digital cooperation. References Ahmad, H., & Muhammad, F. (2026). The AI–climate nexus in international relations: Climate diplomacy, energy transition, and emerging technology governance. Journal of Global Social Transformation, 2(8), 283–293. Al Kium, A., Sarker, S., Shikha, S. A., Kamal, M. A. T., Jabed, M. I. K., Munifa, N. K., … John, D. B. (2023). Health equity and digital disparities in cancer screening and cardiovascular care across socioeconomic and ethnic groups: A systematic review. Vascular and Endovascular Review, 6(2), 35–44. Ali, S. H., & Shahid, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence for climate resilience: The case of Pakistan. IPRI Journal, 25(2), 146–175. https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.250208 Aliu, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence and co-creative digital transformation in climate diplomacy: A green techplomacy approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5274135 Almakaty, S. (2026). Algorithmic diplomacy and the geopolitics of artificial intelligence: Machine-driven international relations in a data-oriented global landscape. Journal of Digital Governance, 14(3), 112–135. Antanasijević, D. Z., Ristić, M. Đ., Perić-Grujić, A. A., & Pocajt, V. V. (2014). Forecasting GHG emissions using an optimized artificial neural network model based on correlation and principal component analysis. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 20, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.011   Ballesteros, A., Nakhooda, S., Werksman, J., & Hurlburt, K. (2010). Power, responsibility, and accountability: Rethinking the legitimacy of institutions for climate finance. Climate Law, 1(2), 261–312. https://doi.org/10.3233/CL-2010-013   Banerji, B., & Saha, N. (2026). Leveraging artificial intelligence for climate diplomacy: Global collaboration on sustainability. In AI for our planet: How artificial intelligence can solve global challenges (pp. 57–72). Bentham Science Publishers. Gavali, H., Jangle, A., Attar, A., Gawande, P., & Yenkikar, A. (2026). Climate intelligence integration: Machine learning, governance, and sustainable development pathways. In Responsible AI for climate action: Governance, justice, and sustainable transitions (pp. 213–244). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. Hossain, I., & Rana, M. S. (2026). A scientometric review of artificial intelligence in climate governance and sustainability pathways. Environment Systems and Decisions, 46(3), 58. Iqbal, U. (2024). AI-enhanced network optimization for electric vehicle charging infrastructure expansion in the United States using graph theory and demand analytics. Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review, 2(2), 112–129. Iqbal, U. (2025a). AI-powered supplier risk intelligence: Predicting financial and geopolitical supply chain disruptions in US critical industries. Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review, 3(2), 173–193. Iqbal, U. (2025b). AI-driven predictive maintenance for US smart manufacturing: Deep learning models for equipment failure prediction and operational resilience. Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review, 3(1), 114–138. Iqbal, U., & Bhutto, Y. (2026). Digital transformation through artificial intelligence and advance business analytic in American operational management. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, 3(1), 37–50. Iqbal, U., Bekmez, S., & Qurashi, F. A. (2026). Operational risk management through machine learning and business intelligence in US businesses. Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity, 54, 239–253. Jabed, M. I. K., Ahmed, M. P., Tofa, F. M., Islam, M. F., Gomes, C. A., & Sirazy, R. M. (2026). Federated intrusion detection for Internet of Medical Things networks: Differential privacy, non-IID robustness, and cross-device generalization. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 8(8), 303–315. Jabed, M. I. K., Imran, M., Khan, A. A., Mehedi, M., Islam, A., & Pervez, R. (2026). Explainable machine learning framework for early heart disease detection using SMOTE and SHAP. Vascular and Endovascular Review, 9(1), 316–324. Jabed, M. I. K., Manzoor, M. A., Tofa, F. M., & Khan, M. H. (2026). Interpretable ensemble learning approach for breast cancer diagnosis using SHAP-based explainable AI. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 8(8), 244–255. Khatoon, S., Awan, A. U. H., Iqbal, Z., & Bibi, M. (2025). Climate change diplomacy and the role of Pakistan in global environmental negotiations. Social Sciences Spectrum, 4(2), 774–792. https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.04.02.350 Koepsell, D. (2026). Repair, capacity, and collapse: A mechanistic early-warning model of political rupture. Journal of Political Risk, 12(4), 78–95. Köseoglu, M. A., Khaki, A., & Arici, H. E. (2026). AI readiness and sustainable development: A systems perspective on health, education, innovation, and climate action. Business Strategy & Development, 9(1), e70315. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70315   Liu, Z., Peng, C., Xiang, W., Tian, D., Deng, X., & Zhao, M. (2010). Application of artificial neural networks in global climate change and ecological research: An overview. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(34), 3853–3863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-4183-3   Mabey, N., Gallagher, L., & Born, C. (2013). Understanding climate diplomacy. E3G (Third Generation Environmentalism). Oxford Insights. (2024). Government AI readiness index 2024. Oxford Insights. Pitafi, I. A., Lak, M. A., Pitafi, N. U., & Pitafi, M. A. U. D. (2025). AI-driven climate change communication strategies in international diplomacy. The Regional Tribune, 4(3), 157–168. Plakas, K., Karampinis, I., Alefragis, P., Birbas, A., Birbas, M., & Papalexopoulos, A. (2023). A predictive fuzzy logic model for forecasting electricity day-ahead market prices for scheduling industrial applications. Energies, 16(10), 4085. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104085   Quadri, S. S. A., Tasadduq, H. A., Tabassum, S., Ahmad, M., & Gishkori, R. (2026). Artificial intelligence and climate governance: The emerging politics of data-driven environmental policy. Journal of Psychology, Health and Social Challenges, 4(1), 39–47. Tan, X., Peng, Z., Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Chao, Q., Huang, X., Yan, H., & Chen, D. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence for research and action on climate change: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Science Bulletin, 70(17), 2886–2893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.06.035   United Nations Development Programme Pakistan. (2026). UNDP, Government of Pakistan convene high-level dialogue on AI for public service transformation and inclusive development. United Nations Development Programme. United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) end-to-end: The environmental impact of the full AI lifecycle needs to be comprehensively assessed—Issue note. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/46288 Wang, G. C., & Jain, C. L. (2003). Regression analysis: Modeling & forecasting. Institute of Business Forecasting.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。