Dataset of GHG and surface albedo effects of natural climate solutions
自然気候ソリューションの温室効果ガスと表面アルベド効果のデータセット (AI 翻訳)
Rémi Cardinael, Lesley W. Atwood, Eric Ceschia, Philippe Ciais, Édouard L. Davin, Souleymane Diop, Lorenzo Genesio, Pia Gottschalk, Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil, Katja Klumpp, Laurent Li, Emanuele Lugato, Bruce Osborne, Jean-Louis Roujean, Sonia I Seneviratne, Petra Sieber, Sebastiaan Luyssaert
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本データセットは、AFOLU部門の16の一般的な自然気候ソリューション（NCS）の温室効果ガスとアルベドによる気候効果を報告する123件の科学記事を収録。管理手法、気候帯、気候効果に応じた結果を抽出・コード化し、温暖化緩和効果の評価とアルベドの影響をまとめた。アルベドを考慮しない場合の気候勘定への影響も分析している。
English
This dataset compiles 123 scientific articles on the greenhouse gas and albedo climate effects of 16 common natural climate solutions (NCS) in the AFOLU sector. Results are extracted and coded by management practice, climate zone, and climate effect, assessing mitigation benefits and albedo trade-offs. It also determines the impact of omitting albedo from climate accounting.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、森林管理や農地管理などのNCSが注目されているが、アルベド効果を考慮した包括的な評価は不足している。本データセットは、日本の気候変動適応策や炭素会計の精緻化に資する可能性があるが、日本固有のデータは含まれていない。
In the global GX context
Globally, natural climate solutions are gaining traction in climate mitigation pathways, but the role of albedo is often overlooked. This dataset provides a systematic synthesis of both GHG and albedo effects, informing more accurate climate accounting for initiatives like the IPCC guidelines and national greenhouse gas inventories.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers can use this dataset to refine Earth system models or conduct meta-analyses on NCS climate impacts.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note the potential overestimation of climate benefits when albedo is omitted from NCS accounting.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The dataset comprises the list of 123 scientific articles reporting on the greenhouse gas-driven and albedo-modulated climate effects of sixteen common NCS in the AFOLU sector. Key results relevant to the management practice, climate zone, and climate effect were extracted and concisely recorded in an expanded results table. These key results were then synthesized and coded into the GHG-driven climate mitigation or albedo-modulated trade-off levels, ranging from “Consistently beneficial” to “Mostly detrimental” to “Uncertain” for GHG and “Synergistic” to “Antagonistic” to “More evidence needed” for albedo. After coding the results for each management practice-climate effect pairing in the table, the impact of omitting albedo from climate accounting was determined to be: - An overestimation of its climate mitigation benefits - An underestimation of its climate mitigation benefits - Uncertain - Unknown These are the data associated with the following article currenty under review: Cardinael, R., Atwood, L. W., Ceschia, É., Ciais, P., Davin, E. L., Diop, S., Genesio, L., Gottschalk, P., Khalil, M. I., Klumpp, K., Li, L., Lugato, E., Osborne, B., Roujean, J.-L., Seneviratne, S. I., Sieber, P., & Luyssaert, S. Carbon, Albedo, and the Net Climate Impact of Nature Based Solutions. (Under Review)
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.18167/dvn1/jdfzq2first seen 2026-06-15 04:56:10 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:41:35
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。