タイのエネルギー移行における電力・環境・セキュリティの多次元市場フレームワーク
Multi-dimensional market framework for electricity, environment, and security in Thailand’s energy transition (原題)
Prakaipetch Muangkhiew, Nan Zhao, Keerati Chayakulkheeree
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、炭素価格、再生可能エネルギー促進、調整力調達を同時最適化する多次元電力市場清算モデルを提案。IEEE30バス系統とタイの160バス相当系統での検証により、単一政策と比較して排出量を約5%削減し、関係者間の厚生配分を改善することを示した。タイの脱炭素ロードマップへの政策的示唆を提供する。
English
This paper proposes a multi-dimensional electricity market-clearing framework that co-optimizes carbon pricing, renewable incentives, and ancillary services. Validation on IEEE 30-bus and a 160-bus Thai system shows ~5% emission reduction and improved welfare distribution compared to single-policy instruments, offering insights for Thailand's decarbonization.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の電力市場改革やGX推進において、炭素価格と市場メカニズムの統合は重要な論点。本研究成果は、日本が今後導入を検討するカーボンプライシングと電力市場の連携設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As global power systems integrate carbon pricing and renewables, this study provides a template for market design that balances emissions, reliability, and equity. Relevant for countries implementing carbon markets and clean energy transitions, offering evidence on co-optimization benefits.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:電力市場設計と炭素政策の統合に関する数値的証拠を提供し、今後の研究の基礎となる。
🏢実務担当者:電力会社やエネルギー企業が、市場メカニズムを活用した脱炭素戦略を検討する際の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:炭素価格と再エネ促進策を組み合わせた市場設計の有効性を示し、政策立案に示唆を与える。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Achieving carbon neutrality in the power sector requires market designs that align economic efficiency with environmental sustainability and system reliability. This paper proposes a multi-dimensional electricity market-clearing framework that co-optimises carbon pricing, renewable energy incentives, and ancillary service procurement, advancing beyond fragmented market approaches. Validation on the IEEE 30-bus test system showed the advantages of the proposed market model in both economic and environmental benefits. Applied to a 160-bus equivalent Thai power system, the model reflects Thailand’s distinctive regulatory structure, rapidly growing demand, and national carbon neutrality commitments. The analysis across five market scenarios reveals that while carbon taxation reduces emissions and generates fiscal revenues, it imposes welfare losses, renewable energy certificate (REC) trading enhances producer viability but has limited operational effects, and ancillary service procurement strengthens reliability at added cost. By contrast, the proposed multi-dimensional market mechanism reduces emissions by nearly 5%, achieves a more equitable distribution of welfare among consumers, producers, government, and renewable participants, and mitigates the drawbacks of single-policy instruments. Sensitivity analyses confirm that integration amplifies the environmental signal of carbon pricing and enhances the welfare gains from REC trading. These results provide timely policy insights for Thailand’s decarbonisation roadmap, demonstrating that coordinated market mechanisms can support emission reduction, system adequacy, and fair welfare allocation. More broadly, the study underscores the potential of multi-dimensional electricity markets to guide emerging economies in designing sustainable, reliable, and inclusive pathways toward carbon neutrality.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109586first seen 2026-09-03 05:00:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。