Dimensional Consistency in Korean Terminology for Force, Energy, and Power in Climate, Energy, and Environmental Fields: A Review
気候・エネルギー・環境分野における韓国語の力・エネルギー・仕事率用語の次元的一貫性：レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Sokhee P. Jung
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、韓国の科学技術用語体系において、物理的次元が異なるエネルギーと仕事率に同じ「力」を表す接尾辞が使われている問題を指摘し、韓国・中国・日本の用語体系を比較分析する。エネルギー関連用語には「能」、エネルギー移動率には「率」を中心とした補完的用語体系を提案し、教育現場での概念理解と科学コミュニケーションの効率向上を目指す。既存の標準用語の即時廃止ではなく、並行使用の可能性を探る。
English
This review identifies the misuse of the suffix 'ryeok' (力) for both energy and power in Korean scientific terminology, which obscures dimensional distinctions. It compares terminology systems in Korea, China, and Japan, proposing complementary terms using 'neung' (能) for energy and 'ilryul' (率) for power transfer rate. The goal is to enhance educational clarity and communication efficiency during the energy transition, without abolishing existing standards.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、SSBJ開示やエネルギー移行に伴い、教育・人材育成の重要性が高まっている。本稿の用語整理の提案は、日本の技術用語の整合性を考える上で参考になるが、直接的な政策・実務への影響は限定的。
In the global GX context
Globally, as energy transition accelerates, clear communication of energy concepts is vital. This paper's comparative terminology analysis offers insights for standardizing technical language in international contexts, though its direct impact on disclosure or policy is limited.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Terminology standardization in energy fields may inform cross-cultural communication in international research collaborations.
🏛政策担当者:Educational standards and terminology consistency could support workforce training for the energy transition.
📄 Abstract（原文）
In modern climate, energy, and environmental fields, optimizing energy efficiency and utilizing renewable energy resources have become central challenges. However, the current Korean scientific and technological terminology system indiscriminately applies the suffix ‘ryeok (力)’ to energy (E) and power (P) — concepts with strictly distinct physical dimensions — thereby undermining dimensional transparency at the morpheme level and causing cognitive confusion in educational and practical settings. This review analyzes, from a comparative perspective, the technological terminology systems of Korea, China, and Japan, which belong to the major Sino-character cultural sphere of Northeast Asia, in order to diagnose the structural limitations of the ryeok (力)-based nomenclature system. It further proposes a complementary terminology system centered on neung (能, energy) for energy- and energy-source-related terms and on ilryul (率, rate) for energy-transfer-rate-related terms. Furthermore, to clarify the physical origin of energy, this review examines “<i>haek-eneoji</i>” (nuclear energy) and “<i>haekneung</i>” as complementary terms for “<i>wonjaryeok</i>” (nuclear power), and introduces “<i>jeongi-ilryul</i>” and its abbreviated form “<i>jeonilryul</i>” as complementary terms for “<i>jeonryeok</i>” (electric power), thereby enhancing conceptual consistency between the mechanical and electrical domains. Rather than advocating for the immediate abolition of established standards, this review explores the possibility of using dimensionally transparent alternative names in parallel, aiming to secure educational clarity suitable for the era of energy transition and enhance the efficiency of scientific communication.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2026.48.5.118first seen 2026-06-18 04:42:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。