gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Carbon Trading and Tree Crop Cultivation: A Synergistic Approach for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Resilience

炭素取引と樹木作物栽培:持続可能な農業と気候レジリエンスのための相乗的アプローチ (AI 翻訳)

Tulika Phukan, Tania Sharma, Bibungsar Bargayary, Binita Hazarika

Archives of Current Research International📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-06#炭素価格Origin: Global
DOI: 10.9734/acri/2026/v26i51895
原典: https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2026/v26i51895
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、炭素取引と樹木作物(果樹園やアグロフォレストリー)の組み合わせが、炭素隔離と炭素クレジット創出にどのように貢献するかを分析。地上部で0.29~15.21 Mg C/ha/年、土壌30~300 Mg C/haの炭素貯留ポテンシャルを示す。課題として取引コストや技術不足を挙げ、制度的支援の必要性を強調。

English

This review analyzes how carbon trading and tree crop cultivation (orchards, agroforestry) synergistically contribute to carbon sequestration and carbon credit generation. It reports carbon storage potentials of 0.29–15.21 Mg C/ha/yr aboveground and 30–300 Mg C/ha in soil. It identifies barriers such as transaction costs and lack of technical knowledge, calling for institutional support and inclusive policies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX文脈では、農林業分野でのJ-クレジット制度との連動が考えられる。樹木作物による炭素貯留は、企業のサプライチェーン排出削減(Scope 3)や、地域のカーボン・オフセットに活用可能。ただし、本論文は国際的なメカニズム(CDM、REDD+)に焦点を当てており、日本独自の制度への直接的な示唆は限定的。

In the global GX context

In the global GX context, this paper reinforces the role of agricultural carbon sinks in voluntary and compliance carbon markets (e.g., CDM, REDD+). It highlights the potential for agroforestry to generate high-quality carbon credits, relevant for corporate offset strategies and net-zero commitments. However, the review does not delve into specific accounting methodologies or additionality challenges.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive overview of carbon sequestration potentials in tree crop systems, useful for researchers working on agricultural carbon accounting.

🏢実務担当者:Agroforestry practitioners can use the carbon storage estimates to assess credit generation feasibility, but need to address transaction cost and technical barriers.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should consider integrating tree crop cultivation into national carbon trading schemes and supporting smallholder participation.

📄 Abstract(原文)

By placing an economic value on carbon sequestration and emission reductions, carbon trading has become a significant market-based strategy to lower greenhouse gas emissions. In this regard, growing tree crops, especially in agroforestry systems, has a lot of potential as a climate-smart and sustainable land-use approach. By storing carbon in both biomass and soil, tree crops like fruit orchards and plantation species serve as long-term carbon sinks, reducing the effects of climate change while boosting agricultural output and ecological stability. This review analyses the fundamentals of carbon trading and looks at how tree crop systems contribute to carbon sequestration and the creation of carbon credits. It emphasizes how agroforestry and orchard systems are included into voluntary and compliant carbon markets, particularly the Clean Development Mechanism and REDD+. Estimates indicate that the carbon reserves in agroforestry vary from 0.29 to 15.21 Mg C/ha/year aboveground and from 30 to 300 Mg C/ha at a depth of up to 1 meter in the soil. The environmental and socioeconomic advantages of these systems, such as enhanced soil health, biodiversity preservation, and varied farmer income, are also included in the paper. However, farmer participation is restricted by issues like high transaction costs, a lack of technical expertise, and unequal access to carbon markets. The study comes to the conclusion that increasing the importance of tree crop cultivation in carbon trading frameworks and attaining sustainable agricultural development require bolstering institutional support, enhancing carbon accounting techniques, and encouraging inclusive policies.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。