Life-cycle assessment of low-carbon hydrogen pathways for decarbonizing industrial energy demand: Industrial clusters in Hebei Province
産業エネルギー需要脱炭素化のための低炭素水素経路のライフサイクル評価：河北省の産業クラスター (AI 翻訳)
Wei Zhang, Oksana Takhumova, Olga Dudina, Victoria Kalitskaya, Shokhrukh Djurakulov
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は中国河北省の鉄鋼・セメント・化学工業クラスターにおける低炭素水素経路のライフサイクル評価を行った。グリッド電解、天然ガス+CCS、石炭ガス化+CCS、バイオマス+CCSの各経路を比較し、温暖化ガス排出量に大きなばらつきがあることを示した。最良の経路でもゼロエミッションには至らず、気候パフォーマンスと大気汚染対策、インフラ要件のトレードオフを指摘した。
English
This study performs a life-cycle assessment of low-carbon hydrogen pathways for industrial clusters (steel, cement, chemicals) in Hebei, China. It compares grid electrolysis, natural gas reforming with CCS, coal gasification with CCS, and biomass gasification with CCS, finding substantial variation in life-cycle GHG emissions. Best pathways approach but do not reach near-zero emissions, highlighting trade-offs between climate performance, air quality co-benefits, and infrastructure needs.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の工業クラスターを対象とした水素脱炭素化経路のLCAは、日本の産業界（鉄鋼・化学）が水素戦略を策定する際に参考になる。特にSSBJ/有報でのScope 1・2削減計画に水素導入を検討する場合、ライフサイクル視点の知見が有用である。
In the global GX context
This Chinese industrial cluster LCA provides a benchmark for global hydrogen decarbonization pathways. It informs ISSB-aligned scope 1&2 reduction strategies and transition finance decisions, especially for hard-to-abate sectors like steel and cement. The trade-off analysis is relevant for policymakers designing hydrogen scale-up policies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The LCA framework and comparative results for multiple hydrogen pathways in a real industrial cluster setting offer methodological insights and data for further modeling.
🏢実務担当者:Industrial firms in steel, cement, and chemicals can use the pathway GHG ranges to assess hydrogen options for their own decarbonization roadmaps.
🏛政策担当者:The paper quantifies the emission reduction potential and trade-offs of hydrogen, supporting policy prioritization for CCS, renewable energy, and hydrogen infrastructure investments.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Hydrogen is increasingly promoted as a strategic vector for decarbonizing industrial energy demand, yet environmental outcomes depend strongly on production pathways and regional context. This article applies a life cycle assessment framework to low-carbon hydrogen options supplying steel, cement and chemical clusters in Hebei Province in northern China. The analysis compares hydrogen from grid-connected electrolysis with a progressively decarbonized power mix, natural gas reforming with carbon dioxide capture, coal gasification with carbon dioxide capture and biomass gasification with carbon capture and storage. System boundaries cover upstream resource extraction, plant construction, operation, transport and end-use combustion or process use. Results indicate substantial variation in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, with the best performing pathways approaching, but not necessarily reaching, near-zero emission levels. Trade-offs emerge between climate performance, air pollutant co-benefits and infrastructure requirements. The findings inform regional industrial decarbonization strategies and highlight priority areas for technology improvement and policy support.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671909001/pdffirst seen 2026-06-19 04:54:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。