Inclusive energy governance in Morocco: Strategic stakeholder dynamics in the advanced metering infrastructure project
モロッコにおける包摂的エネルギーガバナンス：高度計測インフラプロジェクトにおける戦略的ステークホルダーダイナミクス (AI 翻訳)
Nissrine Majit, Naïla Amrous, Jamal Mabrouki
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この研究はモロッコの高度計測インフラ（AMI）プロジェクトにおけるステークホルダー分析を行い、中央集権的なガバナンスパターンと市民社会や大学の弱い統合を明らかにした。意思決定支援ツールとしてのステークホルダーマップを提供し、調整のボトルネックや制度依存関係を特定する。エネルギー移行における制度的設計の重要性を示す。
English
This study conducts a stakeholder analysis of Morocco's Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) project, revealing a centralized governance pattern with weak integration of civil society and academia. It provides a stakeholder map as a decision-support tool to identify coordination bottlenecks and institutional dependencies. The findings underscore the importance of institutional design in energy transitions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文はモロッコのエネルギー移行に焦点を当てているが、日本のGX文脈では、地域エネルギーガバナンスやステークホルダー参加の設計に関して参考になる点がある。特に、市民社会や大学の関与が弱いという課題は、日本の地域エネルギー施策にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
While focused on Morocco, this paper offers insights on stakeholder engagement in energy transition governance that are relevant globally, especially for emerging economies. It highlights the need for inclusive institutional design, which is a key theme in global climate governance discourse.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a qualitative method for stakeholder mapping in energy transitions, applicable to other contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Energy project managers can use the stakeholder map to identify coordination gaps and improve engagement.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of including civil society and academia in energy governance for more inclusive transitions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study conducts a strategic stakeholder analysis of Morocco’s Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) within the country’s broader energy-transition reforms. It employs a qualitative triangulation design, combining semi-structured interviews, deep documentary analysis, and relational mapping. Results highlight a centralised governance pattern in which public institutions, international donors, and local authorities play a dominant role, while civil society organisations, innovation clusters, and universities remain weakly integrated. The analysis identifies structural power asymmetries, zones of uncertainty, and dependency relations that affect policy coordination. The resulting stakeholder map provides a decision-support tool for identifying coordination bottlenecks, clarifying institutional dependencies, and designing more inclusive consultation mechanisms between regulators, operators, territorial actors, innovation institutions, and civil-society representatives. The study contributes to the literature on socio-technical transitions in emerging contexts, where institutional design is as critical as technological innovation. As the study adopts a cross-sectional design, it captures stakeholder relations at a specific stage of AMI deployment rather than their longitudinal evolution. Moreover, because several international stakeholders could not be interviewed directly, part of the analysis of the international cluster relies on secondary institutional reports. Future research should therefore examine how governance arrangements, inter-institutional dependencies, and stakeholder influence patterns evolve throughout the later phases of AMI deployment.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v9i2.5939first seen 2026-06-17 04:43:20 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:07:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。