The renaissance of carbon capture and storage in Germany and the politics of conditionality
ドイツにおける炭素回収・貯留(CCS)の復活と条件性の政治 (AI 翻訳)
Tobias Haas, Alina Brad, Etienne Schneider, Zoé Hüttenhain, Joza Koinzer
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ドイツにおけるCCS復活の政治経済分析。条件付きアプローチと技術オープンアプローチの対立を考察。炭素ロックインリスク低減のための条件付き政策が弱められた要因を、連合、言説、制度的側面から明らかにする。
English
This paper analyzes the political economy behind the renaissance of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in Germany, focusing on the conflict between conditional and technology-open approaches. It identifies coalitional, discursive, and institutional factors that undermined a conditional CCS policy, increasing the risk of carbon lock-in.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のCCS政策（経産省の「CCS長期ロードマップ」、NEDOなど）においても、条件付き利用と技術オープンな利用の間の緊張は重要。ドイツの事例は日本がCCSをどう位置づけるか（排出削減補完か温暖化対策の中核か）に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As global CCS deployment accelerates under IEA net-zero scenarios, the German case offers critical lessons on how political dynamics shape CCS governance. The concept of 'conditionality' is directly relevant to ISSB/TCFD disclosure where companies must articulate their CCS reliance and associated lock-in risks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a political economy framework for analyzing CCS governance, useful for scholars studying carbon lock-in and climate policy conditionality.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams should note the risk of lock-in when pursuing CCS investments; policy conditionality matters for long-term strategy.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights how coalition politics and discourse can shape CCS policy scope; relevant for regulators designing CCS support mechanisms and mitigation deterrence safeguards.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is currently experiencing a renaissance, especially as a means to address so-called hard-to-abate emissions and achieve net-zero climate targets through carbon dioxide removal. However, the role of CCS in climate policy is controversial, given concerns over reinforced carbon lock-in and its potential to weaken other mitigation efforts (mitigation deterrence). We investigate why and how CCS has made a comeback in Germany. Based on approaches from critical political economy and historical-materialist policy analysis (HMPA) we find that the main fault line is whether CCS should be applied only conditionally to hard-to-abate emissions or in a technology-open approach. Our results reveal coalitional, discursive and institutional factors that undermined a limited, conditional approach to CCS that would have reduced the risk of carbon lock-in compared to a technology-open approach.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2026.2700726first seen 2026-07-29 05:08:01
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。