Transition Energy and Technical Efficiency of Energy Companies: DEA and Panel Evidence from Renewable and Traditional Energy Companies in Europe and North America
エネルギー企業の移行期における技術効率性:欧州と北米の再生可能エネルギーおよび伝統的エネルギー企業のDEAとパネル分析 (AI 翻訳)
Agata Gniadkowska‐Szymańska
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2017~2024年のエネルギー移行期における欧州・米国・カナダの上場エネルギー企業の技術効率性をDEA(CCR・BCCモデル)で測定し、パネルデータ分析により財務・組織・地域・ESG要因との関連を検証した。結果、平均的な効率性は中程度で、規模の非効率性が大きいこと、再生可能エネルギー企業はESGスコアが高い一方で伝統的企業より効率性が低いこと、欧州企業が北米より効率的であることなどが示された。ESGパフォーマンスが直接効率性を高めるという証拠は弱く、収益性・レバレッジ・企業規模が重要である。
English
This study measures technical efficiency of listed energy firms in Europe, US, and Canada during 2017-2024 using DEA (CCR and BCC models) and panel data analysis. Findings show moderate efficiency with significant scale inefficiency; renewable firms are less efficient than traditional utilities despite higher ESG scores; European firms outperform North American ones. ESG performance does not robustly improve efficiency; profitability, leverage, and size matter. Energy transition requires effective resource allocation and financial resilience beyond capacity expansion.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のエネルギー企業にとっても、再生可能エネルギーへの移行が効率性を自動的に高めるわけではないという示唆は重要。SSBJ開示や投資家対応において、ESGスコアと財務効率性の関係を過信せず、規模の適正化や財務健全性を重視した経営戦略が求められる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX scholarship by empirically challenging the assumption that renewable energy firms are more efficient. It highlights the role of regulatory pressure (Europe vs. North America) in driving efficiency, relevant for ISSB/CSRD disclosure and transition finance discussions. For global investors and policymakers, it underscores that ESG performance alone does not guarantee operational efficiency.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on the link between ESG and technical efficiency in the energy sector, useful for further research on transition dynamics.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights that renewable expansion must be paired with operational efficiency and financial resilience; useful for corporate strategy and investor relations.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that long-term climate policy exposure may improve efficiency, informing regulatory design for energy transition.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study examines the technical and operational efficiency of publicly listed energy companies operating in Europe, the United States, and Canada during the 2017–2024 energy transition period. The sample includes both traditional electricity utilities and renewable energy producers. Technical efficiency was estimated using output-oriented Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), specifically the Charnes–Cooper–Rhodes (CCR) and Banker–Charnes–Cooper (BCC) models. Panel-data models were subsequently applied to identify the financial, organisational, regional, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors associated with firm-level efficiency. The results indicate a moderate average level of technical efficiency, with a substantial share of inefficiency attributable to an inappropriate operating scale. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, renewable energy companies were, on average, less technically efficient than traditional utilities, despite achieving higher ESG and environmental scores. European companies exhibited higher efficiency than firms located in the United States and Canada, suggesting that long-term exposure to climate-policy and regulatory pressures may encourage more effective resource use. The panel-model results did not provide robust evidence that ESG performance directly improves technical efficiency. By contrast, profitability, leverage, and firm size were significantly associated with efficiency outcomes. These findings show that the energy transition depends on more than the expansion of renewable energy capacity. Effective resource allocation, financial resilience, organisational adjustment, and an appropriate operating scale are equally important. The study provides relevant implications for corporate managers, investors, and policymakers involved in energy-sector transformation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143386first seen 2026-08-08 04:51:26
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。