gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Promising areas of BRICS countries' cooperation in achieving carbon neutrality

BRICS諸国におけるカーボンニュートラル達成のための協力有望分野 (AI 翻訳)

B. S. Bataeva, M. A. Izmailova, Z. A. Ashurov

MIR (Modernization Innovation Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-01#炭素価格
DOI: 10.18184/2079-4665.2026.17.2.215-230
原典: https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2026.17.2.215-230

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文はBRICS+諸国のカーボンニュートラル達成に向けた協力の有望分野を検討。GDP炭素強度と排出量を計算し、中国・インド・ロシアが主要排出国であることを示す。化石燃料依存は続くが、炭素市場の統一や炭素クレジットの相互承認が有望な解決策として提案される。

English

This paper examines BRICS+ cooperation for carbon neutrality. It calculates carbon intensity and emissions, highlighting China, India, Russia as leaders. Despite reliance on fossil fuels, the paper proposes a unified carbon market and mutual recognition of carbon units as key tools. BRICS+ countries favor an adaptive approach to energy transition.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX文脈では、BRICS諸国との連携は直接的ではないが、炭素市場の国際的な枠組み構築の議論は、日本のカーボンプライシング政策(例:GXリーグ)にも示唆を与える可能性がある。特に、炭素クレジットの相互承認は、日本の国際排出量取引の方向性を検討する上で参考になる。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to discussions on international carbon market linkages and cross-border carbon regulation, relevant to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and the growing trend of carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAM). It highlights the need for common standards and mutual recognition among major emerging economies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive analysis of BRICS+ countries' carbon intensity and emissions, and proposes tools for carbon market integration. Useful for scholars studying international climate cooperation and carbon pricing.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams engaging with BRICS markets can gain insights into regional decarbonization priorities and potential carbon credit mechanisms.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the diversity of carbon neutrality timelines and the need for harmonized carbon accounting; relevant for negotiators working on Article 6 and CBAM.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Purpose: to develop proposals for BRICS countries to cooperate in achieving carbon neutrality. Methods: the study used a range of methods, including inductive-deductive, economic-statistical, comparative analysis, abstraction, etc. Results: the article presents calculations of the carbon intensity of GDP and greenhouse gas emissions of the BRICS+ countries, in which China, India and Russia are leading within the group. Overall, the BRICS+ countries account for more than half of global greenhouse gas emissions, the main cause of which is the use of fossil fuels. The variability of the timeframes for achieving carbon neutrality by the BRICS+ countries is identified and the lack of corresponding goals for the new countries of the association (Iran, Egypt, and Ethiopia) is highlighted. Based on an analysis of the ways in which BRICS countries can implement their national-level contributions to decarbonization, key tools and solutions have been identified to overcome the barrier of cross-border carbon regulation. Conclusions and Relevance: the BRICS+ countries, while unanimously recognizing the need to achieve carbon neutrality, have a flexible approach to energy transition, which maintains their own priorities in fossil fuel import and export operations, and do not foresee the refusal to use the fossil fuel in the near future. Among the possible scenarios for decarbonizing national economies – reducing greenhouse gas emissions or adapting to climate change – the BRICS countries tend to follow the adaptive path of implementing climate strategies, demonstrating their variability in terms of the ambition of their goals, the priority given to them, and the methods of implementing decarbonization tools. It is promising for the countries of the association to create the single carbon market, to mutually recognize the carbon units, and approve their verifiers.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。