カナダの農産食品部門における気候誤情報の根源と回復力に関する言説
Discourses on the roots and resilience of climate misinformation: perspectives from the Canadian agri-food sector (原題)
Khondokar H. Kabir, Ataharul Chowdhury
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
カナダの農産食品部門のステークホルダーを対象に、気候変動誤情報の根源と影響をQ方法論で分析。3つの言説（イデオロギー優先、リテラシー不足、プラットフォーム問題）を特定し、科学と制度への信頼低下が共通課題であることを示した。誤情報への耐性強化には、コンセンサスメッセージ、メディアリテラシー教育、プラットフォーム改革が必要と提言。
English
Using Q-methodology with 22 Canadian agri-food professionals, this study identifies three discourses on climate misinformation: Ideology Over Evidence, The Literacy Gap, and The Platform Problem. Findings reveal weakened trust in science and institutions, highlighting the need for tailored interventions combining consensus messaging, media literacy, and platform reforms to support evidence-based climate adaptation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の農業分野でも気候変動適応が進む中、誤情報対策は政策立案や普及活動に示唆を与える。ただし、GX開示や脱炭素経営への直接的な関連は薄い。
In the global GX context
This study contributes to global understanding of climate misinformation in agriculture, relevant for designing communication strategies and adaptation policies. It underscores the importance of trust and literacy in climate action, though not directly tied to disclosure frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:気候変動適応における誤情報研究の方法論（Q方法論）と農業分野への適用例として参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:農業関連企業や普及機関が、ステークホルダーとのコミュニケーション戦略を立てる際の示唆を得られる。
🏛政策担当者:農業分野の気候適応政策において、誤情報対策の重要性と具体的介入策を検討する際の根拠となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Canada’s agri-food sector is increasingly exposed to climate change, and timely, evidence-based adaptation is critical for safeguarding food security and rural livelihoods. Effective adaptation, however, depends on stakeholders sharing an accurate understanding of climate risks, which misinformation now threatens to erode. Climate misinformation poses a growing challenge to sustainable agriculture, shaping perceptions and hindering climate action in Canada’s agri-food sector. This study explores diverse Agri-food stakeholder (researchers/educators, public sector advisors/extension staff, NGO professionals/community organizers, media professionals, and policymakers) perspectives on climate change misinformation using Q-methodology throughout Canada. A systematic literature review informed the development of 33 statements capturing varied aspects of misinformation, including its sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies in relation to climate change and agriculture. Twenty-two Canadian agri-food professionals sorted these statements, and principal component analysis revealed three distinct discourses: Ideology Over Evidence (misinformation shaped by political and identity-based biases), The Literacy Gap (vulnerability due to limited critical thinking and media literacy), and The Platform Problem (digital and algorithmic amplification of false narratives). Despite differing emphases, discourses among agri-food stakeholders acknowledged weakened trust in science and institutions. The findings highlight the need for tailored interventions, combining consensus messaging, media literacy education, and digital platform reforms to enhance resilience against misinformation and support evidence-based climate change adaptation in agriculture.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2026.2713878first seen 2026-08-26 04:33:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。