高品質なエネルギー転換の実現：性能概念に基づく配置分析と経路探索
Unlocking High-Quality Energy Transition: A Configurational Analysis and Path Exploration Based on Performance Concepts (原題)
J. Shan, Chengjun Wang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
社会技術レジーム層に基づき、技術革新・政策支援・エネルギー消費行動・市場環境がエネルギー転換性能に与える複合的影響をfsQCAで分析した研究。技術革新主導型と革新・行動主導型の二つの改善経路を特定し、総合性能と下位性能では最適化戦略が異なることを示す。地域ごとの背景に応じた転換計画の策定を提言する。
English
Using fsQCA grounded in the socio-technical regime layer, this study examines how technological innovation, policy support, energy consumption behavior, and market environment jointly shape energy transition performance. It identifies two improvement paths—technology-driven and innovation-behavior-driven—and shows that strategies for moving from sub-performance optima to overall performance differ. Regions should tailor transition plans to local contexts.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX推進法・第7次エネルギー基本計画や地域脱炭素の文脈と接続しうるが、開示・SSBJ・投資家対応への直接的示唆は乏しい。地域別の転換経路設計を考える参考になる。
In the global GX context
While not a disclosure paper, it contributes to the global energy-transition literature by showing configurational, context-dependent pathways to transition performance—useful for policy design under TCFD/transition-plan expectations, though it does not engage ISSB/CSRD reporting frameworks directly.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー転換性能の複数要因の組み合わせ効果をfsQCAで捉える方法論的枠組みとして参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:自社・地域の転換戦略において技術・政策・行動・市場のどの組み合わせが有効かを検討する際の視点を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:地域特性に応じたエネルギー転換政策の経路設計と、下位目標から全体最適への段階的アプローチの重要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The performance of energy transition serves as a critical indicator for assessing the quality of transitions within energy systems. A high-quality energy transition is essential for the effective implementation of energy transition strategies and the advancement of sustainable development. Based on the socio-technical regime layer of the Multi-Level Perspective framework, this paper identifies the key factors that influence the energy transition performance. It systematically examines the combined impact of technological innovation, policy support, energy consumption behavior, and market environment on energy transition performance using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The study reveals that there are two types of improvement paths, including the “technological innovation-driven” path and the “innovation and behavior-driven” path. By further comparing the improvement configuration of comprehensive performance and sub-performance, it is revealed that there are differences in the strategy for expanding from the local optimum of different transition sub-performance to the overall optimum of transition performance. All regions should consider their unique transformation backgrounds, identify the most suitable improvement path of transition performance, and subsequently develop comprehensive energy transformation plans.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261494460first seen 2026-10-12 04:47:40
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。