← 論文一覧に戻る

花蓮の砂利地層における深層マイクロトンネリング縦坑のアップフロント炭素フットプリント

Upfront Carbon Footprint of Deep Microtunneling Vertical Nodes in Hualien Gravel Strata (原題)

Wen-Sheng Ou, Yu-Sheng Chang

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-31#炭素会計経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.3390/su18178911
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18178911

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

台湾・花蓮の深層マイクロトンネリング縦坑を対象に、EN 15804基準のA1-A5段階のアップフロント炭素評価モデルを構築。深掘削と硬質砂利層により施工時エネルギーが総排出の42.5%、高強度構造物の体化炭素が51.1%を占めることを実証。高炉スラグとフライアッシュを50%置換したコンクリートマンホールで材料削減率15%を達成し、地質起因のエネルギー増分を相殺できることを示した。

English

This study develops an EN 15804-based upfront carbon (A1-A5) assessment model for deep microtunneling vertical nodes in Hualien, Taiwan, under deep excavation and hard gravel strata. Empirical results show construction energy (A5) contributes 42.5% and embodied carbon (A1-A3) 51.1% of total emissions. Scenario analysis reveals that using high-volume SCM concrete (50% cement replacement) achieves a 15% material reduction, offsetting the geological energy penalty, though total A1-A5 emissions remain slightly higher.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の下水道・地下インフラ更新需要に示唆。建設段階の炭素評価はSSBJやカーボンニュートラル宣言に対応するため重要であり、地質条件を考慮したLCAと低炭素材料仕様の調達・設計への統合が求められる。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global construction decarbonization by expanding LCA boundaries to include vertical nodes and geological constraints. It provides empirical evidence for integrating low-carbon material specifications into infrastructure procurement, aligning with international standards like EN 15804 and supporting climate disclosure in the construction sector.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides an expanded LCA framework for underground infrastructure that integrates geological and material factors, useful for further research in construction carbon assessment.

🏢実務担当者:Offers actionable insights for specifying low-carbon concrete in deep excavation projects to offset geological energy penalties, aiding in carbon reduction targets.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for including geological conditions in carbon accounting standards for infrastructure, informing procurement policies and low-carbon material mandates.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Trenchless technologies are essential for urban sewerage infrastructure; however, standard Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) boundaries often overlook the upfront carbon footprint of vertical nodes (working shafts and precast manholes), particularly under deep excavation and difficult geological conditions. To bridge this research gap, this study establishes a comprehensive upfront carbon (Stages A1–A5) assessment model based on the EN 15804 standard, calibrated against empirical microtunneling inventory data from Hualien, Taiwan, characterized by deep excavations (10–12 m) and hard gravel strata (SPT N > 50). The empirical results reveal a dual carbon challenge: a geologically induced energy surge during construction (Stage A5, contributing 42.5% of total assessed upfront emissions) and an embodied carbon lock-in within high-strength permanent structures (Stages A1–A3, contributing 51.1%). To isolate these effects, a progressive four-scenario matrix was evaluated. Scenario simulations demonstrate that adopting high-volume supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) concrete manholes (50% cement replacement: 37.5% GGBS and 12.5% fly ash) achieves a material reduction factor (Rmat) of 15.0% in Stages A1–A3, fully offsetting the isolated 3539 kgCO2e construction-energy increment imposed by the hard gravel strata, although total upfront emissions in Scenario IV remain slightly higher than the baseline Scenario I when evaluated across the complete A1–A5 boundary. This study provides an expanded LCA framework and empirical evidence for integrating geological constraints and low-carbon material specifications into underground infrastructure procurement and engineering design.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。