市民エネルギー・レジリエンスの提起：フィンランドからの実証
Introducing citizen energy resilience: Evidence from Finland (原題)
Leena Eerolainen, Mia Ala-Juusela, Marja Helena Sivonen, Sari Vainikainen, Carolyn Cole
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は「市民エネルギー・レジリエンス（CER）」を社会技術的構成概念として提示する。フィンランドの全国ニュース大規模コーパスと市民社会組織・自治体・エネルギー事業者へのインタビューを帰納的テーマ分析し、技術・インフラ、適応能力・コミュニティ支援、ガバナンスと協働という三つの相互関連次元を特定した。家計の経済力や支援アクセスの格差、脆弱世帯の制約、ガバナンス分断が課題である一方、コミュニティ実践と分散型エネルギー技術にレジリエンス強化の可能性を見出す。
English
This study conceptualizes citizen energy resilience (CER) as a sociotechnical construct emerging from technical systems, governance, and citizens' uneven capacities. Using Finnish national news media and interviews with civil society, municipalities, and energy actors, inductive thematic analysis identifies three dimensions: technical/infrastructural conditions, adaptive capacities and community support, and governance/collaboration. Findings show unequal access to resources and resilience technologies, with vulnerable households most constrained, while community practices and distributed energy technologies offer resilience potential.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではエネルギー安全保障・電力需給逼迫・地域分散電源（VPP・再エネ自家消費）が政策課題化しており、市民・地域レベルの適応力格差という視点は、公正な移行（just transition）や地域脱炭素の制度設計に示唆を与える。SSBJ開示とは直接接続しないが、気候リスクの社会側面として統合報告の文脈で参照可能。
In the global GX context
Globally, this adds a citizen-level, equity-focused lens to energy transition and climate adaptation scholarship, complementing TCFD/ISSB physical-risk framing with social resilience and governance fragmentation. It speaks to just-transition and CSRD social-disclosure debates by evidencing uneven adaptive capacity across demographic and regional groups.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:社会技術的レジリエンス概念と混合手法（メディアコーパス＋インタビュー）の実証例として、エネルギー移行研究の社会側面を補完する。
🏢実務担当者:地域・顧客の脆弱性把握や分散型電源・コミュニティ支援策の設計に、レジリエンス格差の視点を組み込む示唆。
🏛政策担当者:エネルギー貧困・適応格差とガバナンス分断への対応として、公平なレジリエンス政策と関係者間調整の枠組み設計に資する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines citizen energy resilience (CER) as a sociotechnical construct. Responding to increasing disruptions driven by climate change, market volatility and geopolitical instability, this research conceptualizes CER as emerging from the dynamic interplay of technical systems, governance structures, and citizens' uneven capacities to anticipate, cope with, and recover from energy-related disruptions. Drawing on empirical evidence from Finland, the study analyzes a large corpus of national news media alongside interviews with civil society organizations, municipalities, and energy-sector actors. Through inductive thematic analysis it identifies three interrelated dimensions shaping CER: technical measures and infrastructural conditions, adaptive capacities and community support, and governance and collaboration. The findings show that citizens' ability to cope with energy disruptions is heavily conditioned by unequal access to financial resources, resilience technologies and support structures. Adaptive capacities such as scarcity skills and the ability to respond to disruptions vary significantly across demographic and regional groups. Vulnerable households face the greatest constraints. Governance fragmentation, unclear role division and limited coordination between stakeholders further hinder the development of comprehensive resilience arrangements. At the same time, community-based practices and emerging distributed energy technologies demonstrate significant potential for strengthening resilience. Strengthening CER requires integrated approaches that combine equitable technological pathways, enhanced community capacities and coordinated governance. Embedding these elements into preparedness and energy transition strategies can enhance societies' ability to withstand disruptions, while promoting fair and inclusive energy resilience across populations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104982first seen 2026-10-16 04:43:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。