Opinions of EU citizens about climate policy in their own words
EU市民の気候政策に関する意見：市民自身の言葉で (AI 翻訳)
Savin, Ivan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
EU13カ国で実施された市民調査により、気候政策への支持とその理由を自由記述で収集・分析。1266件の回答から13の主要トピックを抽出し、国別の傾向や政策手段への言及頻度を評価。具体的な政策手段（直接規制や炭素価格）に言及した回答は全体の約25%にとどまり、市民の政策認識不足が示唆された。
English
Analysis of 1266 open-text responses from a 13-country EU survey on climate policy support. Only 25% of responses mentioned concrete policy instruments like carbon pricing or regulation, indicating inadequate awareness. Opponents concentrated in Eastern Europe. Findings highlight need for better information provision.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
欧州の調査は気候政策への市民の理解不足が支持を制限することを示す。日本でもGX推進（炭素価格導入など）には国民への丁寧な情報提供が不可欠であり、本知見は日本の政策コミュニケーション戦略の参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper underscores the gap between citizen awareness and policy complexity in the EU, relevant for global policymakers designing effective climate policies. The qualitative method offers transferable insights for any jurisdiction seeking public legitimacy for decarbonization measures.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Methodology for coding open-ended responses on climate policy support; reveals disconnect between citizen understanding and policy detail.
🏢実務担当者:Use findings to design more accessible climate communication materials that explain specific policy instruments.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights urgency of public information campaigns about concrete policy tools to build support for climate action.
📄 Abstract（原文）
To mitigate climate change, policy measures should not only be effective but also politically viable. Views of citizens are vital in this regard as they underlie voting outcomes and subsequent political decisions. The present study presents results from a public survey conducted in 13 EU countries about public support for climate policy measures. This involves analyzing 1266 open textual responses and identifying thirteen main topics. We compare the prevalence of topics between EU countries and assess how topics relate to average support for climate policy and opinions on economic growth. More prevalent topics relate to sector-specific strategies, such as aimed at waste and transport, which are relatively popular among female respondents. Only about 25% of responses mention concrete policy instruments, such as direct regulation or carbon pricing. This may indicate inadequate awareness of policy details among European citizens and contribute to limited public support for climate policy in general. Surprisingly, people claiming to have a good understanding of climate policy suggest a vague strategy like reducing consumption instead of concrete policy measures. Opponents of climate policy are found especially in Eastern European countries. Our findings point at the need for more information provision to citizens about policy details and effectiveness.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/18803036first seen 2026-05-14 21:29:26 · last seen 2026-05-14 21:39:01
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。