Carbon credits as a source of financial support for agricultural enterprises
農業企業の資金調達源としての炭素クレジット (AI 翻訳)
Ruslan Motyl, Taras Tsiura
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、炭素クレジットが農業企業にとって追加的な資金調達手段となり得るかを理論的・方法論的に分析する。5,000ヘクタールの農地を想定したシナリオ分析では、検証済み排出削減量やクレジット価格、MRVコストに応じて、純収入が1ヘクタールあたり0.83ドルから14.00ドルになると試算。炭素クレジットは単独の資金源ではなく、気候リスク軽減や持続可能な農業市場での競争力強化と組み合わせたブレンデッド・ファイナンスの一部として位置づけるべきと結論づける。
English
This paper develops a theoretical and methodological framework for assessing carbon credits as a financial source for agricultural enterprises. Using scenario modeling for a 5,000-hectare farm, net income ranges from USD 0.83 to USD 14.00 per hectare depending on verified emission reductions, credit prices, and MRV costs. Carbon credits should be integrated into a blended financial mechanism combining revenue generation, risk mitigation, and enhanced competitiveness.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも農林水産省が「J-クレジット」制度を通じて農業分野の炭素クレジットを促進している。本論文のモデルは、日本の農業企業がクレジット収入を事業計画に組み込む際の参考となる。また、MRVコストや市場流動性の考慮点は、日本の制度設計にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, voluntary carbon markets are expanding, and agricultural carbon credits are gaining attention. This paper provides a practical model for assessing financial viability, addressing key issues such as verification costs, market liquidity, and strategic fit. It contributes to the growing literature on climate finance and offers insights for integrating carbon credits into agricultural business models under evolving disclosure and sustainability standards.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured financial assessment model for agricultural carbon projects, useful for climate finance and carbon market researchers.
🏢実務担当者:Agricultural enterprises can use the scenario model to evaluate potential carbon credit revenue and incorporate it into financial planning.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for supportive policies to reduce MRV costs and enhance market liquidity for agricultural carbon credits.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Introduction. The strengthening of climate policy, the expansion of carbon pricing mechanisms, and the growing demand for sustainable agricultural products are creating new opportunities for diversifying the financial resources of agricultural enterprises. In this context, carbon credits are increasingly considered a potential financial instrument, although their implementation is associated with substantial market, institutional, and methodological risks. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to develop a theoretical and methodological framework for assessing the financial feasibility of using carbon credits as a source of financial support for agricultural enterprises. Methodology. The research is based on systemic, institutional, financial-analytical, risk-oriented, and scenario approaches. The study employs open-access data from international organizations, regulatory documents, voluntary carbon market reports, and recent scientific literature on climate finance, soil carbon sequestration, additionality, and greenhouse gas verification. Results. An original model for assessing the financial suitability of agricultural carbon projects is proposed, integrating climate outcomes, carbon credit market liquidity, verification-related costs, and strategic compatibility with the enterprise’s production model. The study identifies key financial channels through which carbon credits generate economic benefits, including direct credit sales, project pre-financing, access to sustainable finance, supply-chain premiums, and enhanced investment attractiveness. Scenario modelling for an agricultural enterprise with a 5,000-hectare land bank demonstrates that net income may range from USD 0.83 to USD 14.00 per hectare depending on verified emission reductions, carbon credit prices, and monitoring, reporting, and verification costs. Conclusions. Carbon credits should not be regarded as a guaranteed financing source for agricultural enterprises. Instead, they should be integrated into a blended financial mechanism that combines additional revenue generation, climate risk mitigation, improved access to finance, and enhanced competitiveness in sustainable agricultural markets.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2026.02.025first seen 2026-06-17 05:40:16 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:13:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。