gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Agroforestry-based carbon farming: Agronomic strategies for climate change mitigation and sustainable agriculture

アグロフォレストリーに基づく炭素農業:気候変動緩和と持続可能な農業のための農学的戦略 (AI 翻訳)

Ama Sylvie Massa Olloh, Shilpa Kaushal

International Journal of Research in Agronomy📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-01#炭素会計Origin: Global
DOI: 10.33545/2618060x.2026.v9.i5b.5491
原典: https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060x.2026.v9.i5b.5491
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

アグロフォレストリーは、樹木と作物・家畜を意図的に組み合わせることで、炭素隔離と農業生産性を両立する土地利用アプローチである。本レビューでは、アグロフォレストリーシステムの炭素隔離能が単作の2~4倍であり、全球で年間1.12Pg CO2相当を捕捉可能と推定。しかし、土地所有の不安定、知識不足、炭素モニタリングシステムの欠如、金銭的インセンティブ不足が大規模導入を制限している。政策手段と炭素市場メカニズムの必要性を強調している。

English

This review synthesizes evidence that agroforestry systems can sequester 1.12 Pg CO2 equivalent annually globally, holding 2-4 times more carbon than monocropping and increasing soil organic carbon by 34% on average. Despite this potential, large-scale adoption is hindered by land tenure insecurity, knowledge gaps, inadequate monitoring, and lack of financial incentives. The paper discusses policy levers and carbon market mechanisms to scale agroforestry as a climate-smart practice.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、農林水産省が「みどりの食料システム戦略」で炭素貯留型農業を推進しており、アグロフォレストリーはその一環として注目される。ただし、日本の農業規模や土地利用の制約を考慮した実証研究が不足しており、本レビューの知見を日本で応用するには地域適応の検討が必要である。

In the global GX context

Agroforestry is gaining attention in global climate mitigation as a nature-based solution, but its integration into carbon markets and national accounting frameworks (e.g., under Paris Agreement Article 6) faces challenges around MRV and permanence. This review provides a comprehensive basis for policymakers and standard-setters developing protocols for agricultural carbon credits.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive synthesis of carbon sequestration potential and identifies key research gaps for scaling agroforestry.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for designing carbon farming projects and monitoring systems, including co-benefits and implementation barriers.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights necessary policy levers and carbon market mechanisms to promote agroforestry as a climate-smart practice.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Agriculture has a paradoxical place in the global climate system: it is both a significant anthropogenic source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and a landscape with significant capacity to sequester carbon. The agriculture, forestry, and other land use (AFOLU) sector contributes about a fifth of the global anthropogenic GHG emissions, which are mainly due to enteric fermentation, soil management, land-use change, and rice production. Agroforestry: The intentional combination of trees and crops and/or livestock has become a scientifically sound, multifunctional land-use approach that can effectively balance agricultural productivity with carbon sequestration in the atmosphere. The review is a synthesis of peer-reviewed literature on the carbon sequestration capacity of agroforestry systems, agronomic systems that maximize carbon sequestration, and the co-benefits of environmental and socioeconomic aspects of adoption. The most important results suggest that agroforestry systems have the potential to capture 1.12 Pg CO 2 equivalent of CO 2 per year at the global level, and as a rule, hold two to four times more carbon than the monocropping systems. Agroforestry systems have an average of 34% greater soil organic carbon stocks compared to adjacent monocultures. In spite of this possibility, large-scale implementation is limited by land tenure insecurity, lack of knowledge, limited carbon monitoring systems, and lack of financial incentives. The review ends with a discussion on policy levers, carbon market mechanisms, and priority research directions needed to scale agroforestry-based carbon farming as a mainstream climate-smart agricultural practice.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。