炭素回収発電所とPower-to-Liquid/Gas技術の統合システムにおける最適設計とスケジューリング
Optimal Design and Scheduling for Integrated System of Carbon Capture Power Plant with Power-to-Liquid/Gas Technologies (原題)
Lei Wang, Zongyue Tang, Ruxing Gao, Chundong Zhang, Ki‐Won Jun, Seok Ki Kim, Hui Wan, Guofeng Guan, Wenheng Jing
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
石炭火力発電所に炭素回収とPower-to-Liquid/Gas（PTL/PTG）を組み合わせ、回収CO2を合成原油やSNGに転換する統合システムを提案。二段階スケジューリングモデルで経済性と低炭素性を最適化し、600MWe発電所で日次利益48万ドル超、固定運用比12.59%改善を達成。電力・製品価格変動の影響も分析し、CCSとの比較も行った。
English
This study proposes an integrated system combining coal-fired power plants with carbon capture and power-to-liquid/gas (PTL/PTG) technologies to convert captured CO2 into syncrude and synthetic natural gas. A two-level scheduling model optimizes economic efficiency and low-carbon performance, achieving a daily profit of $484,367 for a 600 MWe plant, a 12.59% improvement over fixed operation. It also analyzes price impacts and compares with CCS.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では石炭火力の段階的廃止が議論される一方、CCUSや合成燃料（e-fuel）はGX推進戦略の重要技術。本論文のPTL/PTG統合システムと需給調整の最適化手法は、国内のCCUS拠点計画やカーボンリサイクル実証に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this work contributes to the growing literature on CCUS and Power-to-X as decarbonization pathways for hard-to-abate sectors. The two-level scheduling approach offers a quantitative framework for integrating carbon capture with synthetic fuel production, relevant to TCFD/ISSB transition planning and climate finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CCUSとPower-to-Xの統合システム設計・運用最適化の定量モデルを提供。
🏢実務担当者:炭素回収と合成燃料製造の経済性評価手法として、事業性検討に活用可能。
🏛政策担当者:炭素回収・利用の政策設計やインセンティブ設計の参考になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract In order to decarbonize coal-fired power plants (CFPPs), this study proposed an integrated system combining CFPPs and carbon capture technologies and utilizing the power-to-liquid/gas (PTL/PTG) approach to convert captured CO2 into high-value-added syncrude and synthetic natural gas (SNG). Afterward, a two-level scheduling model was developed to optimize both economic efficiency and low-carbon performance. The first level applied a price-based demand response mechanism to adjust the electricity load and determine the optimal time-of-use price, while the second level employed a time-related scheduling mode for the system configuration. As a result, for a typical 600 MWe CFPP, the highest daily profit can reach $484367, exhibiting improvements of 12.59% and 14.69% over systems operating under fixed operation conditions and electricity prices, respectively. Additionally, we also investigated the impact of varying electricity, syncrude, and SNG prices on system performance and compared the highest profits with systems incorporating carbon capture and storage technologies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6c02824first seen 2026-10-11 04:43:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。