When rules fall behind: How outdated regulations stall the energy transition
ルールが遅れを取るとき：時代遅れの規制がエネルギー移行を阻害する方法 (AI 翻訳)
Imad Antoine Ibrahim, Bart Homan, Susanne Skårup, Weronika Radziszewska, Adrian Lis, Frans Coenen, Thomas Hoppe
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、デンマーク、インド、ポーランド、オランダの7つのコミュニティにおけるエネルギー移行の規制障壁を質的比較事例研究により分析。8つの主要な規制障壁を特定し、それらが地域のエネルギーイニシアチブのペースや方向性にどのように影響するかを明らかにした。適応的で参加型の規制枠組みの必要性を強調している。
English
This paper examines regulatory barriers to local energy transitions across seven communities in Denmark, India, Poland, and the Netherlands. It identifies eight main regulatory barriers affecting decentralized energy initiatives, showing how they overlap and reinforce each other. The study highlights the need for adaptive, participatory, and interoperable regulatory frameworks.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも地域エネルギーコミュニティの推進が進む中、本論文が特定した規制障壁は日本のGX政策にも示唆を与える。特に、EUのエネルギー法の国内実施の差異や、規制の不確実性など、日本の状況にも共通する課題が指摘されている。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a comparative analysis of regulatory barriers across different legal systems, informing global discussions on how to design adaptive policies for local energy communities. It contributes to the literature on energy justice and decentralization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper offers a systematic categorization of regulatory barriers and a qualitative comparative methodology useful for energy transition researchers.
🏢実務担当者:Energy communities and project developers can use the identified barriers to anticipate challenges in their own contexts.
🏛政策担当者:The paper underscores the need for flexible and inclusive regulatory frameworks to support local energy initiatives.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Local energy transitions are promoted as means to achieve decarbonization, ensure democratic participation by local communities in energy decision-making, and foster social acceptance of renewable energy projects. However, despite the growing maturity of energy technologies and increased policy support, local energy initiatives continue to face regulatory barriers that limit their capacity to achieve their goals. The article examines how legal frameworks stall local energy transitions across seven communities in Denmark, India, Poland, and the Netherlands. It identifies eight main regulatory barriers and examines how they operate in practice through a qualitative, comparative case study approach. These are: 1) traditional regulatory frameworks limit decentralized energy initiatives; 2) national implementation of EU energy law as a supranational legal order differs between nations, creating uneven conditions for local energy initiatives; 3) laws and regulations lag behind technological development in decentralized energy systems; 4) local and remote energy communities have limited access to regulatory decision-making; 5) regulatory ambiguity and policy uncertainty discourage local and community energy investment; 6) complex and burdensome administrative procedures slow local energy project development; 7) limited standardization and interoperability hinder renewable energy deployment and 8) restrictive rules limit energy sharing and peer-to-peer exchange among communities. The obstacles overlap and reinforce one another, shaping the pace, direction, and scope of local energy initiatives. The findings show how these regulatory barriers are experienced in practice across different contexts, legal systems, and institutions. They also highlight the need for more adaptive, participatory, and interoperable regulatory frameworks that can accommodate decentralized energy initiatives.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104749first seen 2026-05-30 04:41:42 · last seen 2026-06-03 04:44:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。