Scenario-based energy and environmental assessment for climate-responsive and low-carbon building design
気候対応型・低炭素建築設計のためのシナリオベースのエネルギー・環境評価 (AI 翻訳)
Shreya Bhardwaj, Ann Francis, Ranjith P. Soman
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、インドの多様な気候地域における住宅建築の壁材のエネルギー性能と炭素排出を比較評価した。将来の気候シナリオ（2020年代、2050年代、2080年代）に基づくシミュレーションとライフサイクル評価を組み合わせ、アドベやAACブロック、フライアッシュレンガが高い効率を示した。気候変動を考慮しないと電力消費を過小評価するリスクを明らかにした。
English
This study evaluates wall envelope materials for low-carbon residential design in India using scenario-based energy simulation and life-cycle assessment. Adobe bricks, AAC blocks, and fly ash bricks show best efficiency. Ignoring climate change underestimates electricity consumption by 9% over 75 years. Climate-aligned grid decarbonization could reduce operational carbon by up to 39%.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも、住宅の低炭素化は重要課題。本研究のような気候変動を考慮した建材評価手法は、日本のZEHや省エネ基準の策定に示唆を与える。特に、気候変動の影響を無視した場合の過小評価リスクは、日本の建築業界にも当てはまる点で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a methodology for integrating future climate scenarios and grid decarbonization into building material selection, relevant for global green building standards. The findings highlight the risk of underestimating energy demand if climate change is ignored, which is critical for long-term building performance under current climate pledges.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Method for combining climate-responsive simulation and LCA for material selection.
🏢実務担当者:Insights on prioritizing wall materials for low-carbon residential design across climates.
🏛政策担当者:Evidence for updating building codes to account for future climate and grid decarbonization.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Purpose This study aims to generate evidence-based guidance for climate-responsive residential building design by comparing the energy and carbon performance of alternative wall-envelope materials across diverse climatic contexts. Design/methodology/approach A residential prototype was modelled as a case study and assessed for embodied carbon, cradle-to-grave environmental impacts and operational energy demand under projected future climate scenarios for the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s, incorporating anticipated changes in the electricity supply mix. Wall material alternatives were subsequently prioritised using a multi-criteria performance comparison. Findings Adobe bricks, AAC blocks and fly ash bricks demonstrated the highest overall efficiency across embodied carbon, operational energy and life-cycle impact parameters. Climate-aligned grid decarbonisation could reduce operational carbon emissions by up to 39%. In contrast, neglecting climate change results in an underestimation of electricity consumption by 9% over a 75-year building life-cycle. Originality/value This study evaluates wall material performance by combining future climate-responsive energy simulation with life-cycle environmental assessment in a scenario-based analysis. The results across multiple Indian climatic zones provide context-specific insights for low-carbon residential design.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-10-2025-0669first seen 2026-06-07 04:56:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。