From UNFCCC rules to domestic delivery: An institutional economics explanation of Indonesia’s commitment and implementation gap in emission reduction
UNFCCCのルールから国内実施へ：インドネシアの排出削減におけるコミットメントと実施ギャップに関する制度経済学的説明 (AI 翻訳)
Amellya Yunita Syari, Husyaimiah Syifahani, Nuraisyah Jamar, Muh Firmansyah, Wirawan Firman Nurcahya
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、UNFCCCに基づく気候ガバナンス、特にパリ協定の誓約・レビューロジックと強化された透明性枠組み（ETF）が、インドネシアの排出削減コミットメントと実施ギャップにどのように影響するかを制度経済学の観点から分析する。測定・報告・検証（MRV）や登録制度、調整の義務付け、資金ガバナンスなどの国内の信用性を生み出すメカニズムを通じてUNFCCCの影響が及ぶことを示す。気候資金が依然として最大の制約であり、投資ニーズが現在の公的資金と追跡された気候関連資金を大幅に上回っている。
English
This study analyzes how UNFCCC-based climate governance, particularly the Paris Agreement's pledge and review logic and Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), shapes Indonesia's mitigation commitments and explains the persistence of the implementation gap. Using institutional economics, it finds that UNFCCC influence operates through domestic credibility mechanisms like MRV, registry routines, coordination mandates, and finance governance. Climate finance remains the binding constraint, with investment needs far exceeding current public coverage and tracked climate-aligned flows. The paper argues that Paris effectiveness depends on domestic governance capacity.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文はインドネシアを対象としているが、日本にとっては、国際的な気候変動枠組みが国内実施に与える影響や、MRV・気候資金ガバナンスの課題について示唆に富む。日本のGX政策においても、施策の実施ギャップと資金メカニズムの設計は重要な論点である。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a detailed institutional analysis of how international climate governance translates (or fails to translate) into domestic action, using Indonesia as a case study. It highlights the critical role of domestic governance capacity—especially regulatory coherence, renewable energy deployment, and climate finance—in closing the implementation gap, which is a key global challenge for the Paris Agreement's effectiveness.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers studying the implementation gap in climate policy, the role of MRV and finance governance, or the institutional economics of international environmental agreements will find a rich analytical framework and case evidence.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers in developing countries and those involved in climate finance and transparency frameworks can learn from Indonesia's experience in aligning UNFCCC rules with domestic delivery.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines how UNFCCC-based climate governance, particularly the Paris Agreement’s pledge and review logic and the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), shapes Indonesia’s mitigation commitments and explains the persistence of the commitment and implementation gap. Using a theory informed documentary analysis grounded in New Institutional Economics, Transaction Cost Economics, and polycentric governance, the study synthesizes authoritative legal and policy documents alongside credible institutional reports. The findings show that UNFCCC influence operates mainly through domestic credibility producing mechanisms, especially Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) and registry routines, coordination mandates, and finance governance. Indonesia’s delivery gap is concentrated in cross sector regulatory coherence, clean energy implementability within a fossil dominant energy structure, and climate finance governance. Climate finance remains the binding constraint, as investment needs substantially exceed current public coverage and tracked climate aligned flows. The paper argues that Paris effectiveness ultimately depends on domestic governance capacity, particularly regulatory harmonization, implementable renewable deployment, stronger finance governance, and subnational MRV.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v6i2.2119first seen 2026-06-05 04:59:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。