Comparative Cost Analysis of Conventional Building Materials and Smart Low-Cost Alternatives for G+1 Residential Building
G+1住宅建築における従来建材とスマート低コスト代替材の比較コスト分析 (AI 翻訳)
Bhushan S. Madavi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドの住宅建築において、従来建材とスマート低コスト材料（AACブロック、EPSパネルなど）のコスト比較分析を実施。スマート材料を使用することで建設コストが約18.44%削減され、構造荷重の低減や施工速度向上、エネルギー効率改善も確認された。持続可能な住宅実現に有効な手法を提示。
English
This study compares cost estimation between conventional and smart construction materials (AAC blocks, EPS panels, gypsum plaster) for a G+1 residential building in India. Results show smart materials reduce total construction cost by 18.44% while also lowering structural load, shortening construction time, and improving energy efficiency, contributing to sustainable housing.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも建築物の省エネ基準強化に伴い低炭素建材の採用が進む。本論文の示すAACブロックやEPSパネルは日本でも利用可能であり、コスト削減と環境負荷低減の両立に示唆を与える。ただしインド事例のため、日本の気候・建築基準との差異には注意。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence that smart low-cost materials can reduce construction costs and improve energy efficiency, supporting the global push for sustainable affordable housing. It adds to the literature on green building materials and cost-benefit analysis, relevant for both developing and developed countries seeking to reduce embodied carbon.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a clear methodology for cost comparison and sustainability assessment of building materials using the central line method.
🏢実務担当者:Provides concrete data on 18.44% cost savings and material choices (AAC blocks, EPS panels) for affordable housing projects.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights potential for policy incentives to promote smart materials in construction to reduce emissions and housing costs.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The construction industry in India is experiencing a rapid increase in material and labor costs, making conventional construction methods increasingly expensive and less sustainable. Traditional materials such as clay bricks, Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), steel, and river sand contribute not only to higher construction costs but also to significant environmental degradation due to high energy consumption and carbon emissions. In this context, the use of smart and low-cost construction materials has emerged as an effective alternative for achieving economical and sustainable building solutions. This study presents a comparative analysis of cost estimation between conventional building materials and smart/green construction materials for a G+1 residential building. The analysis is carried out using the central line method of estimation, ensuring consistent material quantities for both cases. Parameters such as cost, material consumption, dead load, construction time, labor requirement, and sustainability are evaluated. The results indicate that the use of smart materials such as AAC blocks, EPS panels, and gypsum plastering reduces the overall construction cost by approximately 18.44%. Additionally, these materials contribute to reduced structural load, faster construction, and improved energy efficiency. The study concludes that smart and low-cost materials provide a viable solution for affordable housing while promoting sustainable construction practices
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2026.78909first seen 2026-06-29 06:57:35
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。