Synergies and Trade-Offs in Modern Poultry Nutrition: An Integrated Framework Linking Animal Health, Productivity and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
現代の家禽栄養における相乗効果とトレードオフ：動物の健康、生産性、温室効果ガス削減を結びつける統合フレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
Dexin Zhao, Haoliang Chai, Linfeng Zhou, Ruicheng Han, Weiqi Peng, Hongzhi Wu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
家禽栄養が動物の健康、生産性、環境負荷に与える影響を統合的にレビュー。低タンパク質飼料や精密給餌などの介入がGHG削減に有効だが、栄養過剰制限や添加物の不安定性、LCA前提の違いが効果を左右する。生理的充足、精密給餌、機能性介入、全チェーン検証の4段階意思決定フレームワークを提案。
English
This review integrates poultry nutrition with animal health, productivity, and GHG mitigation. It evaluates low-protein diets, feed enzymes, precision feeding, and manure management, highlighting synergies and trade-offs. A four-level decision framework is proposed to balance biological, economic, and environmental outcomes, emphasizing standardized LCA and commercial validation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の畜産分野では、GHG削減と生産性向上の両立が課題。本フレームワークは、SSBJ開示やサプライチェーン排出量算定における飼料由来排出の評価に活用可能。
In the global GX context
Globally, livestock supply chains face pressure to reduce emissions. This framework supports TCFD/ISSB-aligned disclosure by providing a structured approach to assess nutritional interventions' environmental impacts, relevant for companies reporting Scope 3 emissions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured framework for evaluating nutritional interventions' multi-dimensional impacts, useful for LCA and sustainability research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers practical guidance for selecting feed strategies that balance productivity and emission reduction, aiding corporate sustainability reporting.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for standardized LCA in agricultural policy to support GHG mitigation targets.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Poultry nutrition simultaneously affects animal health, productive efficiency, product quality and the environmental burdens associated with feed production and manure management. Nutritional interventions may generate synergies among these outcomes, but they can also shift costs or environmental impacts across biological and supply-chain boundaries. This review critically evaluates low-protein diets, functional additives, feed enzymes, alternative protein sources, precision-feeding technologies and nutritional approaches to manure-emission mitigation. The evidence indicates that improved intestinal function and nutrient retention can reduce feed requirements and nutrient excretion, whereas excessive protein restriction, unstable additive responses, limited alternative-ingredient supply and poorly validated digital systems may compromise performance, product quality or economic feasibility. Environmental benefits are also sensitive to ingredient origin, processing, transport, crystalline amino acid and additive manufacture, coproduct allocation and life cycle assessment assumptions. To integrate these considerations, we propose a four-level conceptual decision framework comprising physiological adequacy, precision nutrient supply, constraint-specific functional intervention and whole-chain verification. The framework treats health, productive performance, product quality, economic feasibility and environmental impact as simultaneous decision criteria, while genotype, production stage, disease pressure, climate, ingredient availability and market objectives define the conditions of application. Standardized life cycle assessment and commercial validation are required to distinguish reproducible net benefits from improvements confined to individual indicators. This approach provides a structured basis for selecting poultry nutritional strategies that remain biologically effective, economically accessible and environmentally beneficial under practical production conditions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13080789first seen 2026-08-16 06:02:07
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。