現実的な地中CO2貯留予測には、更新されたコストと地質ポテンシャルの前提が必要
Feasible geological carbon dioxide storage projections require updated cost and geological potential assumptions (原題)
Iain de Jonge-Anderson, Gareth Johnson, Anne Merfort, Jessica Strefler, Catrin Harris, Jennifer J. Roberts
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
統合評価モデル(IAM)は気候緩和経路で大規模なCO2地中貯留を予測するが、その実現可能性は疑問視されてきた。本研究は主要6モデルを分析し、貯留コストと地質ポテンシャルの前提が古い文献に基づくことを指摘。最新のデータ提供の緊急性を訴える。
English
Integrated Assessment Models project large-scale CO2 geological storage, but feasibility is questioned. Analyzing six leading models, this study finds storage cost and geological potential assumptions remain outdated, urging the CCUS community to provide updated datasets for more reliable mitigation pathways.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではCCS長期ロードマップやGX実現に向けたCO2貯留の位置づけが重要。本研究はIAM前提の透明性向上に寄与し、日本のCCS政策評価や2030年目標の実現可能性検討に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper strengthens the credibility of CCS in climate pathways by highlighting outdated assumptions in IAMs, relevant for IPCC assessments and national climate strategies. It calls for improved data transparency and collaboration between modeling and storage communities.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:IAMモデルの前提更新に必要なデータ要件と、貯留コスト・ポテンシャル評価の最新動向を把握できる。
🏢実務担当者:CCSプロジェクトの経済性評価や、政策対話における貯留可能性の根拠として活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:気候目標達成におけるCCSの役割を評価する際、モデル前提の更新とデータ整備の必要性を認識できる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Integrated Assessment Models project large-scale deployment of carbon dioxide geological storage across many climate change mitigation pathways. However, the feasibility of these projections - particularly concerning near-term scale-up rates - has been criticised. Here, we examine six leading detailed-process Integrated Assessment Models to explicate how carbon dioxide geological storage constraints have improved since the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, including how feasible deployment rates are defined. We find these Integrated Assessment Models limit carbon dioxide geological storage deployment by drawing on datasets defining annual storage rates, storage costs, and geological storage potential. However, while recent updates have focused on annual storage rates, cost and storage potential assumptions remain rooted in outdated literature. Our findings highlight an urgent need for the carbon dioxide geological storage community to provide updated and Integrated Assessment Model-ready datasets to improve understanding of and confidence in the role of carbon dioxide geological storage in climate change mitigation pathways. Our work also contributes to ensuring the assumptions embedded in Integrated Assessment Model projections remain transparent. Recent updates of leading integrated assessment models incorporate dynamic near-term scale-up rates of carbon dioxide storage, whereas storage cost and geological potential assumptions remain largely unchanged according to scenarios of the IPCC 6th Assessment Report.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03901-5first seen 2026-08-30 04:35:36
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。