インドネシアの気候外交：JETP下でのバイオマス混焼への批判と課題
Indonesia’s Climate Diplomacy: Criticisms and Challenges of Biomass Co-firing Under JETP (原題)
Ade Arya Yunissa, Ali Maksum
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、JETP枠組みにおけるインドネシアのバイオマス混焼政策を気候外交の観点から分析する。政府は脱炭素へのコミットメントを示す外交手段として混焼を利用する一方、国際社会からは「偽りの解決策」と批判され、石炭延命や森林破壊の懸念が指摘される。この政策の矛盾がJETP資金の停滞を招き、国内規制と国際規範の摩擦が気候資金の行き詰まりを生むと論じる。政策提言として、持続可能性基準の強化と純再生可能エネルギーへの資金振り向けを求める。
English
This study analyzes Indonesia's biomass co-firing policy under JETP from a climate diplomacy perspective. The government uses co-firing as a diplomatic tool to show decarbonization commitment, but it faces international criticism as a 'false solution' that extends coal and risks deforestation. This policy contradiction stalls JETP funds, and the friction between domestic regulations and global norms creates a deadlock in climate finance. Policy recommendations include tightening sustainability standards and redirecting funds to pure renewables.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はJETPを通じたインドネシアのエネルギー転換支援に関与しており、バイオマス混焼の是非は日本の二国間クレジット制度や石炭火力輸出政策にも示唆を与える。日本のGX実務者は、国際規範と国内政策の摩擦が資金調達に与える影響を理解する上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on just energy transition and climate finance, highlighting how domestic political economy can undermine international climate commitments. It offers a critical perspective on biomass co-firing as a transition strategy, relevant for countries and investors engaged in JETP and similar mechanisms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a political science lens on energy transition, complementing technical studies on biomass co-firing.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights risks of biomass co-firing for corporate sustainability strategies and supply chains in Southeast Asia.
🏛政策担当者:Offers insights into how international criticism can affect climate finance disbursement and the need for policy alignment.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study analyzes Indonesia’s climate diplomacy in developing biomass through coal co-firing policies as a strategy to achieve Net Zero Emissions (NZE) within the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) framework. The research focus is directed at how Indonesia constructs its domestic energy transition narrative amid rising international criticism regarding the sustainability and effectiveness of biomass. Utilizing a qualitative method with a case study approach, data collection was conducted through a comprehensive literature review, analysis of government policy documents, international organization reports, and publications from global environmental institutions. Theoretically, this study applies the concepts of climate diplomacy and the just energy transition framework. The findings reveal a structural policy misalignment. Indonesia utilizes biomass co-firing as a diplomatic instrument to demonstrate its decarbonization commitment while maintaining national energy stability. However, this policy has drawn sharp global criticism for being perceived as a "false solution" that extends the lifespan of coal plants, risks driving deforestation through Energy Plantation Forest expansion, and weakens Indonesia's bargaining position, thereby stalling the disbursement of JETP grants. The novelty and research gap of this study lie in its shift from the technical-economic aspects of biomass to the political dimensions of international relations. This study fills a literature gap by mapping how the friction between domestic regulations and global green norms creates a deadlock in climate finance. The policy implications urge the Indonesian government to reconfigure its diplomatic strategy by tightening biomass sustainability standards and redirecting international funding toward pure renewable energy infrastructure.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.31764/jgop.v8i1.40158first seen 2026-08-21 04:34:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。