気候ファイナンスメカニズムのグローバルゲームと中国の対応
Global Game of Climate Finance Mechanisms and China’s Response (原題)
Chao Feng, Xiaohua YUAN, Wenjie LI, Xuhua SUN
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、パリ協定後の気候ファイナンスの国際交渉を分析し、責任分担や資金源、ガバナンス規則をめぐる対立を整理。COP30での途上国の公平性要求や、G20・BRICS等の外交プラットフォームの多様化を踏まえ、中国の役割と対応戦略を考察する。
English
This paper analyzes international climate finance negotiations post-Paris Agreement, focusing on responsibility allocation, funding sources, and governance rules. It examines deepening divergences at COP30, developing countries' equity demands, and the diversification of climate diplomacy platforms, concluding with China's strategic response.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本にとって、気候ファイナンスの国際交渉動向は、途上国支援や民間資金動員の枠組みに影響する。中国の戦略を理解することで、日本のGX金融政策や国際協調の位置取りを考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a Chinese perspective on global climate finance governance, relevant to international negotiations on the New Collective Quantified Goal and fund governance. It offers insights for global scholars and policymakers on the evolving dynamics between developed and developing countries.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:気候ファイナンスの国際交渉における中国の立場と戦略を理解するための分析枠組みを提供。
🏛政策担当者:気候ファイナンス交渉における中国の対応を把握し、国際交渉戦略の参考にできる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Global climate change is reshaping national development paths and the landscape of global governance. Since the conclusion of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992, the international community has gradually formed a multilateral system centered on the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, establishing principles such as common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, and carrying out cooperation in areas including mitigation, adaptation, finance, and technology. Since the Paris Agreement entered into force, climate finance has grown in importance and become a key pillar supporting climate action in developing countries and driving the green transition. From the billion-dollar pledge in 2009 to the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) after 2025, the climate finance issue is undergoing a leap from billions to trillions of dollars, with the allocation of responsibilities, funding sources, and governance rules becoming focal points of negotiations. As demonstrated at the 30th Conference of the Parties (COP30), held in Belém, Brazil, in November 2025, divergence over issues such as the responsibility boundaries under Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, fund governance rules, and the Baku to Belém Roadmap to 1.3T continues to deepen, while developing countries’ demands for equity and accessibility have grown more intense. Meanwhile, climate diplomacy platforms are becoming increasingly diverse, through which interactions among entities such as G20, BRICS, and the Global South take place. The funding issue has gradually evolved into a game over development rights and institutional power. Looking ahead, China’s role in global climate finance governance and negotiations will attract even greater attention.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345748126500181first seen 2026-09-04 05:07:54
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。