Cement Industry Pollution Mitigation: A Comprehensive Review on Reducing Environmental and Health Impacts.
セメント産業の汚染緩和：環境および健康への影響を低減するための包括的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Kamal Hosen, A. Bărbulescu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、セメント製造によるGHG・粒子状物質・重金属などの環境・健康影響を緩和する技術を網羅的に検討。CCUS、バイオマス・廃棄物由来燃料、騒音・土壌・水質汚染対策を評価し、長期的な耐久性・拡張性・費用対効果に研究ギャップがあると指摘。統合的汚染対策戦略の必要性を強調している。
English
This comprehensive review examines mitigation technologies for environmental and health impacts from cement production, including CCUS, biomass/waste-derived fuels, noise barriers, soil remediation, and water treatment (ZLD). It identifies research gaps in long-term durability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, calling for integrated pollution control strategies to support a sustainable cement transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のセメント産業はCO₂排出量が大きいため、CCUSや代替燃料の技術実装はGX政策（グリーンイノベーション基金など）と密接に関連。本レビューは国内外の技術オプションを俯瞰し、日本企業の脱炭素戦略立案に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a global technology review for cement decarbonization, directly relevant to ISSB/TCFD-aligned disclosure on transition risks and opportunities. The identified CCUS and alternative fuel pathways inform corporate climate strategies and policy frameworks like the EU ETS and Clean Steel/Concrete initiatives.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Identifies key research gaps (scalability, cost, durability) in cement pollution mitigation technologies, guiding future work.
🏢実務担当者:Compiles a menu of mitigation options (CCUS, fuel switching, noise/water controls) that cement companies can evaluate for their decarbonization roadmaps.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for integrated policy support across CCUS, waste-derived fuels, and waste management to drive sectoral transformation.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Cement production exerts a significant negative impact on the environment through the emission of greenhouse gases, particulate matter (PM), heavy metals, and other toxic substances into the atmosphere, soil, and bodies of water, degrading the environment and affecting the population's health. This study reviews different solutions to reduce pollution and mitigate its effects. Particular attention is given to Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technologies and their ability to significantly reduce CO2. Biomass and waste-derived fuels were identified as viable substitutes for fossil fuels, although challenges related to supply chain reliability and secondary environmental impacts remain. The study further examined mitigation strategies for non-gaseous pollutants, including noise pollution control measures such as sound barriers and vibration isolation systems, soil remediation techniques such as phytoremediation and the recycling of cement kiln dust (CKD), and water pollution control technologies, including filtration, chemical precipitation, biological treatment, and Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) systems. Key research gaps were identified, particularly concerning the long-term durability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness of these mitigation approaches. Overall, the review emphasizes the need for integrated pollution control strategies to support the transition toward a more sustainable cement industry and recommends future research focused on developing mitigation technologies that are efficient, economically viable, and adaptable to large-scale industrial applications.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14020138first seen 2026-05-06 00:01:27
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。