Community gardens as locally embedded nature-based solutions: a comparative study of Budapest and Turin
地域密着型の自然を基盤とした解決策としてのコミュニティガーデン：ブダペストとトリノの比較研究 (AI 翻訳)
Luca Battisti, Adrienne Csizmady, Federico Cuomo, Luca Kristóf, Boldizsár Megyesi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はブダペストとトリノのコミュニティガーデンを、地域に埋め込まれた自然を基盤とした解決策（NbS）として比較分析する。5つのブダペストと2つのトリノの庭園で47件の半構造化インタビューを実施し、社会的・技術的・生態的次元から評価した。庭師たちは公式用語を使わずにNbSに沿った実践を行っており、社会的包摂や資源制約への適応、生物多様性の向上が確認された。制度的支援はトリノが強い一方、ブダペストは草の根の自発的活動が特徴的である。
English
This study compares community gardens in Budapest and Turin as locally embedded nature-based solutions (NbS). Based on 47 semi-structured interviews across five gardens in Budapest and two in Turin, it interprets gardeners' practices along social, technical, and ecological dimensions. Gardeners enact NbS-aligned approaches without using the terminology, fostering well-being, resource adaptation, and biodiversity. Turin benefits from strong institutional support, while Budapest shows resilient grassroots stewardship.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では都市の緑地政策や生物多様性戦略が進む中、市民参加型のNbS実践の知見は自治体やコミュニティ運営に示唆を与える。ただし、GHG排出削減や開示実務（SSBJ等）との直接的な接点は薄い。
In the global GX context
As NbS gain traction in global climate adaptation and biodiversity frameworks (e.g., EU, IPBES), this paper offers evidence that grassroots stewardship is a critical yet often overlooked dimension of implementation. It complements top-down policy by showing how communities enact NbS in practice, relevant to urban resilience and sustainability governance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a multidimensional framework for studying NbS implementation outside formal planning; useful for urban sustainability and stewardship research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for community garden organizers and local governments on low-tech adaptation, collaborative problem-solving, and institutional support.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the value of supporting grassroots NbS stewardship through governance arrangements and institutional flexibility.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article examines how community gardens in Budapest and Turin function as locally embedded nature-based solutions (NbS) through the everyday practices of urban residents. While European policy frameworks increasingly promote NbS, less attention has been paid to how they are interpreted and enacted outside formal planning arenas. Drawing on a comparative qualitative design, the study analyses 47 semi-structured interviews conducted in five gardens in Budapest and two in Turin. Using a multidimensional analytical framework, we interpret gardeners’ activities across social, technical, and ecological dimensions. The findings show that gardeners in both cities practice NbS-aligned approaches even when they do not explicitly use the terminology. Socially, gardens foster well-being, inclusion, and community cohesion. Technically, gardeners adapt to resource constraints and climatic pressures through low-tech experimentation and collaborative problem-solving. Ecologically, they support biodiversity, soil regeneration, and microclimate regulation through organic cultivation and composting. Differences between the two cities reflect contrasting governance contexts. While Turin benefits from stronger institutional support, Budapest demonstrates resilient grassroots stewardship. The study contributes to NbS debates by highlighting community gardens as practice-based socio-ecological infrastructures and by showing how stewardship constitutes an important dimension of urban NbS implementation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33119065first seen 2026-08-01 05:39:00 · last seen 2026-08-01 05:39:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。