Evaluating nuclear power feasibility under competing energy technologies: A multi-criteria decision analysis framework
競合するエネルギー技術下での原子力発電の実現可能性評価：多基準意思決定分析フレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
Md Ashraful Islam, M M Naushad Ali, Mirjalol Ismoilov, Ian B. Benitez, Hayitov Abdulla Nurmatovich, Pardaev Jamshid, Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan, Aymen Flah
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はバングラデシュを対象に、原子力、再生可能エネルギー、従来型電源の包括的な実現可能性をAHPを用いて評価。環境面と社会的受容性では再生可能が優位だが、系統信頼性やベースロード容量では原子力が最適とされ、両者が補完的であることを示した。
English
This study evaluates the feasibility of nuclear, renewable, and conventional electricity generation in Bangladesh using AHP. Renewables rank highest in environmental and social criteria, while nuclear excels in reliability and baseload capacity, suggesting a complementary role for both in the country's energy mix.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
バングラデシュという特定国のケーススタディだが、途上国における原子力と再エネの相補性を示す分析は、日本のエネルギー政策（特に電源構成の多様化）にも参考となる。ただし、日本の規制・制度文脈は異なるため直接適用は難しい。
In the global GX context
While focused on Bangladesh, the multi-criteria framework and finding that nuclear and renewables can complement each other offer insights for global energy transition debates, particularly for developing countries balancing decarbonization and energy security.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured MCDA approach (AHP) for comparing energy technologies across multiple criteria, applicable to other country contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for energy planners in developing nations to understand trade-offs between nuclear and renewables.
🏛政策担当者:Supports evidence-based energy mix decisions by highlighting complementary roles of nuclear and renewable energy.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Bangladesh, a developing nation experiencing significant population and industrial growth, faces an increasing demand for electricity. This demand is further compounded by global climate change, prompting a search for low-carbon electricity generation technologies to mitigate environmental impact. Among the clean energy technologies, nuclear power emerges as a promising solution to conceal emissions. The comparative performance of nuclear power against renewable and conventional generation technology in Bangladesh remains unexplored, which makes energy planning challenging. To overcome this issue, this study aims to conduct an evaluation of the comprehensive feasibility of nuclear, renewable, and conventional electricity generation technologies in the context of Bangladesh. Six decision-making criteria, including technical, environmental, economic, policy, and institutional factors, strategic significance, and socio-economic factors, were primarily adopted, and later these criteria were divided into 16 sub-criteria to make an evaluation using a multi-criteria approach. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to evaluate alternatives with respect to each criterion to synthesize global priorities. The findings reveal that considering environmental superiority and social acceptance, renewable energy seize highest preference while nuclear power emerges as the best in terms of system reliability, base-load capacity, and geopolitical security. Traditional sources are scored lowest for sustainability and strategic horizon. Sensitivity analysis documents the stability of these rankings with respect to reasonable ranges of expert judgments. These results indicate that nuclear and renewable will be complementary to one another in the electric mix of Bangladesh. It can also help provide energy system stability and reduced greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions for environmental sustainability.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.111203first seen 2026-06-12 04:50:57 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:41:02
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。