気候政策における沈黙：ブラジルの漁業、政策インセンティブ、そして欠落した低炭素移行
Silence in climate policy: fisheries, policy incentives, and the missing low-carbon transition in Brazil (原題)
José Amorim Reis‐Filho
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ブラジルの連邦気候法制度110件を精査し、漁業が気候ガバナンスにほぼ組み込まれていないことを示した研究。排出インベントリ・脱炭素目標・カーボンフットプリント管理はいずれも欠如し、1997〜2025年に約52.5億リットルの軽油補助金が化石燃料依存を固定化。漁業を緩和枠組みに統合する政策経路を提案する。
English
Screening 110 Brazilian federal legal instruments, this study shows fisheries are largely absent from national climate governance: none address emission inventories, decarbonization targets, or carbon-footprint management. Fossil-fuel subsidies (~5.25 billion liters of diesel, 1997–2025) and an aging fleet reinforce carbon lock-in. It proposes pathways to integrate fisheries into Brazil's mitigation framework, with lessons for emerging economies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
ブラジル漁業の政策空白を扱うが、日本のGX文脈では水産セクターのScope 3・サプライチェーン排出管理や、食料システムの脱炭素政策を検討する際の比較事例として参考になる。
In the global GX context
Adds a sectoral-governance lens to global climate disclosure scholarship: it shows how fossil-fuel subsidies and fleet-capital cycles create carbon lock-in where no MRV, targets, or carbon accounting exist — a gap relevant to ISSB/CSRD scope expansion into food systems and to transition-finance eligibility debates in emerging economies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:政策アーキテクチャと炭素ロックインの実証として、セクター別緩和ガバナンス研究に有用。
🏢実務担当者:水産・食品サプライチェーン企業がScope 3や調達先の脱炭素リスクを評価する際の参考事例。
🏛政策担当者:化石燃料補助金と規制空白が低炭素移行を阻む構造を示し、セクター統合型政策設計の示唆を提供。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation has become a central priority as countries align production systems with climate targets. Because emission reductions depend on regulatory frameworks that translate international commitments into operational measures, legal and policy architecture is decisive for low-carbon transitions. Fisheries, as a fuel-dependent food-producing and income-generating sector, are part of this governance chain, yet remain an overlooked arena for climate policy. This is particularly relevant in Brazil, a country with a prominent role in climate diplomacy but where fisheries are largely absent from the national mitigation agenda. This study examines how Brazil’s climate-related legal and regulatory architecture addresses extractive fisheries, focusing on mitigation, adaptation, and carbon governance. The results reveal a structural deficiency: Of the 110 federal legal instruments screened, 50% showed no relevant interface with climate governance, and only 14 were classified as having direct or indirect relevance to the fishing fleet. Yet none addressed core mitigation dimensions required for a sector-specific low-carbon transition, including emission inventories, decarbonization targets, or carbon-footprint management. At the same time, public policies have sustained substantial fossil-fuel subsidies, totaling approximately 5.25 billion liters of diesel between 1997 and 2025. Combined with a fleet age structure dominated by vessels built during the 2000s capitalization cycle, this trajectory reinforces carbon lock-in, as investment and engine decisions have long-term implications. The study proposes pathways to incorporate fisheries into Brazil’s mitigation framework, offering lessons for emerging economies facing similar governance gaps.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1969108first seen 2026-09-17 04:48:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。