gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Integration of chemical looping and Fischer-Tropsch processes for efficient biomass to liquid fuel production and carbon dioxide sequestration

バイオマスから液体燃料の効率的生産と二酸化炭素隔離のためのケミカルルーピングとフィッシャー・トロプシュ法の統合 (AI 翻訳)

Krutarth Pandit, Ishani Karki Kudva, Shekhar G. Shinde, Connor Breneman, Liang-Shih Fan

Bioresource Technology📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-11#CCUSOrigin: US経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: transport
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2026.135108
原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2026.135108

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、ケミカルルーピングとフィッシャー・トロプシュ法を統合したCLFTプロセスを提案し、バイオマスガス化による液体燃料製造とCO2分離を同時に実現する。プロセスシミュレーションとベンチスケール実験により、自熱運転と高純度合成ガス、CO2回収を確認。技術経済分析では、インセンティブありで最低販売価格2.75$/GGEを示し、経済性の可能性を実証した。

English

This study presents an integrated Chemical Looping Fischer-Tropsch (CLFT) pathway for biomass-to-liquid fuels with inherent CO2 capture. Process simulations and bench-scale experiments confirm autothermal operation, high-purity syngas and sequestration-ready CO2. Techno-economic analysis yields a minimum fuel selling price of 2.75$/GGE with incentives. The pathway provides a technically feasible and economically competitive carbon-managed fuel production.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のバイオマス活用やCCUS政策(GX基本方針)に関連し、輸送部門の脱炭素化に貢献する技術として注目される。簡素なCO2分離プロセスは、日本のバイオマス発電所などへの応用可能性がある。

In the global GX context

This work addresses the challenge of decarbonizing hard-to-electrify transport sectors through an integrated BECCS pathway. The staged chemical looping approach eliminates external CO2 capture systems, offering a simplified route for carbon-negative liquid fuel production globally.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a novel process design with experimental validation and techno-economic analysis for integrated CCUS and biofuels.

🏢実務担当者:Process simulation results and economic data can inform feasibility assessments for biofuel and chemical looping projects.

🏛政策担当者:Techno-economic outcomes under incentive scenarios support policy design for advanced biofuels and carbon management technologies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Decarbonizing hard-to-electrify transportation sectors require biomass-to-liquids pathways that integrate carbon management without excessive process complexity. This study presents a fully integrated chemical looping Fischer-Tropsch (CLFT) pathway in which Fischer-Tropsch tail (FT) gas is directly incorporated into the chemical looping system using a circulating Fe-Ti oxygen carrier (OC). By restructuring the reduction stage into two sequential moving-bed reactors and oxidizing the FT tail gas within the redox cycle prior to biomass gasification, the process enables inherent CO 2 separation and autothermal operation while generating high-purity syngas suitable for direct FT synthesis. This integration eliminates the need for solvent-based CO 2 capture, extensive water–gas shift conditioning, and external oxygen supply required in conventional biomass gasification systems. Process simulations demonstrate stable autothermal performance at combustor temperatures near 950°C, producing syngas purities of 85–86% and sequestration-ready CO 2 streams exceeding 95% purity. Carbon efficiency to liquid fuels reaches approximately 37% for corn cob biomass under optimized conditions. Bench-scale experimental validation in a 2.5 kW th moving-bed reactor confirms high-purity CO 2 production and syngas compositions consistent with Aspen Plus predictions. A techno-economic analysis at a commercial scale of 2000 tonnes/day (tpd) yields a minimum fuel selling price of 2.75 $/GGE under federal incentive scenarios and 3.55 $/GGE without incentives. Sensitivity analysis identifies biomass feedstock cost and capital investment as dominant economic drivers. The results demonstrate that staged chemical looping integration provides a technically feasible and economically competitive pathway for carbon-managed liquid fuel production.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。