サステナビリティ会計とESG報告の品質:体系的文献レビューと今後の方向性
Sustainability accounting and ESG reporting quality: a systematic literature review and future directions (原題)
Wasim K. Al-Shattarat, Basiem K. Al-Shattarat, Ruba S. Hamed
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、サステナビリティ会計実務(SAP)がESG報告の品質に与える影響を、TCCM枠組みで2001年から2026年前半の査読論文156本を統合して検討した体系的レビューである。SAPは測定・内部統制を強化し、GRI・SASB・ISSBなどの枠組み採用を促すことで報告品質を高める。環境・ガバナンス領域で改善が顕著な一方、社会領域は測定困難から遅れている。AI・クラウド・自動化ツールがデータ信頼性やリアルタイム報告に寄与するが、中小企業や新興国では導入が遅い。
English
This systematic review synthesizes 156 peer-reviewed articles (2001–H1 2026) using the TCCM framework to examine how sustainability accounting practices (SAP) shape ESG reporting quality. SAP strengthen measurement and internal controls and drive adoption of GRI, SASB, and ISSB frameworks, with gains strongest in environmental and governance dimensions and weaker in social aspects. Digital technologies—AI, cloud platforms, and automation—increasingly improve data reliability and real-time reporting, though smaller firms and emerging economies lag. The review maps interconnected roles of accounting, regulation, governance, and technology in credible sustainability disclosure.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
SSBJ基準の導入や有報でのサステナビリティ開示義務化が進む日本では、会計実務とESG報告品質の関係を整理した本レビューは、企業の開示体制構築や保証対応の指針として有用。特にAI活用によるデータ信頼性向上は、日本企業のScope3算定や統合報告書の精度向上に直結する。
In the global GX context
As ISSB standards are adopted globally and CSRD/SEC climate rules expand, this review clarifies how accounting practices underpin credible ESG disclosure—directly relevant to TCFD/ISSB implementation and assurance readiness. It highlights AI's role in data reliability, offering a roadmap for jurisdictions building disclosure infrastructure.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:サステナビリティ会計とESG報告品質の研究動向をTCCMで整理し、今後の研究課題を提示する。
🏢実務担当者:GRI・SASB・ISSB採用やAI活用による報告品質向上の実務的示唆を得られる。
🏛政策担当者:規制・ガバナンス・技術の相互作用を踏まえ、象徴的開示を減らす政策設計の参考になる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
This systematic literature review examines how sustainability accounting practices (SAP) influence the quality of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) reporting. Drawing on the TCCM framework, we synthesised 156 peer-reviewed articles published between 2001 and the first half of 2026. The findings show that SAP play a central role in improving ESG reporting quality. They strengthen measurement systems and internal controls and promote the adoption of widely recognised reporting frameworks such as GRI, SASB, and ISSB. Improvements are particularly evident in the environmental and governance dimensions, while progress on social aspects remains more limited due to measurement challenges. In addition, digital technologies, including AI, cloud platforms, and automated tools, have increasingly contributed to data reliability, real-time reporting, and overall efficiency over the past decade, although smaller organisations and firms in emerging economies often lag in adoption. Overall, the review highlights the interconnected roles of accounting practices, regulation, governance, and technology in shaping more credible and useful sustainability information. It also identifies key areas where future research and policy initiatives could help reduce symbolic disclosure and enhance the real-world impact of ESG reporting.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2725487first seen 2026-09-12 05:01:12 · last seen 2026-09-12 05:01:14
- scopus https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/105050223758first seen 2026-09-18 05:36:31 · last seen 2026-09-21 05:34:36
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。