← 論文一覧に戻る

国家主導の気候中間組織は気候ガバナンスを形作るか：ネットゼロ社会移行に向けた対話の促進者として

State‐Initiated Climate Intermediaries Shaping Climate Governance–Needed Facilitators of Dialogue for Societal Transition to Net Zero? (原題)

Alexander Nordt, Karin Bäckstrand

Environmental Policy and Governance📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-06#政策Origin: EU
DOI: 10.1002/eet.70153
原典: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70153
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

国家が設立・設計する「国家主導気候中間組織（SICI）」の政策特性を、スウェーデンとオランダの事例から灰色文献分析で解明する。オーケストレーション理論とミッション志向イノベーション政策を橋渡しする新枠組みを提示。SICIは部門横断的参加と市民対話を促し包摂的な気候行動を促進するが、任意コミットメントの実施を追跡する仕組みを欠き、気候アウトカムは結論できないと指摘する。

English

This paper analyzes state-initiated climate intermediaries (SICIs) in Sweden and the Netherlands via grey literature, using a framework bridging orchestration theory and mission-oriented innovation policy. It finds SICIs foster cross-sectoral participation and public dialogue for inclusive climate action, but lack systematic tracking of voluntary commitments, so climate outcomes remain unverified. It defines SICIs as a distinct intermediary type and frames states as orchestrators.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではGX推進機構やトランジション・ファイナンス推進の枠組み設計と通じ、国が中間組織を通じて企業・自治体の気候行動を誘導する際の「任意コミットメントの検証欠如」という課題は、SSBJ開示や有報での実効性担保を考える上で示唆に富む。

In the global GX context

As ISSB/CSRD disclosure regimes push companies toward credible transition plans, this paper's finding that state-orchestrated intermediaries mobilize actors but fail to track voluntary commitments speaks directly to the global credibility gap in net-zero governance and the role of public-private orchestration.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:国家による気候中間組織の設計とオーケストレーション理論の接合に関心を持つガバナンス研究者に有用。

🏢実務担当者:自主的気候コミットメントの実施追跡が欠ける点は、自社のトランジション計画の検証可能性を設計する際の参考になる。

🏛政策担当者:国が中間組織を通じて気候行動を誘導する際、参加者の約束履行を追跡する仕組みの設計が不可欠だという示唆を与える。

📄 Abstract（原文）

ABSTRACT As governments intensify efforts to achieve net zero goals, they increasingly rely on forms of indirect governance to mobilise societal actors and facilitate climate action. Governance literature focuses on orchestration by organisations and governments that engage intermediaries to pursue shared governance goals. While intermediaries are recognised in climate governance as go‐between organisations operating between governance levels to affect climate policy, less is known about states that establish and design intermediaries for steering climate action. This paper unpacks policy characteristics of what we call state‐initiated climate intermediaries (SICI) to gain a nuanced understanding of this dynamic. It examines cases of SICIs in Sweden and the Netherlands using grey literature analysis. Case analysis is guided by a novel conceptual framework that bridges orchestration theory with mission‐oriented innovation policy. The analysis indicates that mission‐oriented policy of SICIs that encourages cross‐sectoral participation and dialogue with the wider public facilitates inclusive climate action. However, neither intermediary provides systematic mechanisms for tracking participants' implementation of voluntary commitments. The available evidence therefore indicates facilitation and stakeholder mobilisation, but does not permit conclusions about the resulting climate outcomes. This paper makes a conceptual contribution to climate governance literature by defining SICIs as a distinct climate intermediary type with mission‐oriented policy characteristics. It contributes to an empirical understanding of states as orchestrators of SICIs and mission‐oriented innovation policy to steer these intermediaries' climate initiatives towards mission goals.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。