Climate Inequality: Carbon Capture for Redistribution
気候不平等：再分配のための炭素回収 (AI 翻訳)
Elisa Belfiori, Manuel Macera
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
地域間の富と気候脆弱性の違いを考慮した最適気候政策を理論的に分析。不均一性を代表的地域モデルに集約できることを示し、富裕地域がより多くの炭素回収を担うべきと結論。一様な負担が課される場合のみ、排出目標が緩和される。炭素回収が再分配メカニズムとして機能することを示す。
English
This paper theoretically analyzes optimal climate policy with heterogeneous regions differing in wealth and climate vulnerability. It shows that the model can be aggregated into a representative region, implying wealthier regions should bear more responsibility for carbon capture. Inequality alone does not compromise emissions targets unless uniform contributions are required. Carbon capture serves as a redistribution mechanism when lump-sum transfers are unavailable.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の気候政策や国際交渉において、公平性と排出削減の両立を考える上で示唆的。特に、途上国支援や炭素回収技術の国際的負担配分の議論に参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global climate policy debates on equity and burden-sharing, particularly relevant for international climate negotiations and the design of carbon capture deployment mechanisms. It offers a theoretical framework for integrating inequality into optimal climate policy, which is pertinent to global discussions on climate finance and just transition.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical framework for incorporating inequality into optimal climate policy, useful for further research on climate justice and carbon capture.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for corporate sustainability teams on the potential role of carbon capture in addressing climate inequality, though practical applications are limited.
🏛政策担当者:Informs policymakers on how to design climate policies that account for regional inequality and the potential of carbon capture as a redistribution tool.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT We study optimal climate policy in a global economy where regions differ in wealth and climate vulnerability. Carbon emissions from production lead to output losses, and there is a technology for carbon capture. We provide an aggregation result: the model with heterogeneity can be cast into a representative region economy with a different discount factor and damage function. This result offers a simple rule to account for inequality in the design of climate policy. We show that wealthier regions should bear more responsibility for carbon capture to reduce atmospheric carbon and that inequality per se does not entail a compromise on the global emissions target. It is only if regions must contribute uniformly to carbon capture that the optimal climate policy dictates higher global net emissions relative to the first best. Carbon capture serves as a natural redistribution mechanism precisely because lump‐sum transfers are unavailable.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70134first seen 2026-08-11 04:37:43
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。