← 論文一覧に戻る

Revolutionizing cotton scouring: From ancient methods to eco-friendly breakthroughs

綿の精練の革命:古代の方法から環境に優しいブレークスルーへ (AI 翻訳)

A. Hashem, Chukwunonso O. Aniagor

Next Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-17#省エネOrigin: Global経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: textile
DOI: 10.1016/j.nxsust.2026.100419
原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2026.100419

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

綿の精練は従来のアルカリ法で水を大量消費し、高COD排水を生む。本レビューは酵素、超音波、プラズマ、超臨界CO2、ナノテクなどの新技術を比較し、環境性能と経済性を評価。酵素法はCODを低減しつつ処理時間が長く、超臨界CO2はほぼ無水だが高コスト。政策と市場の障壁を分析し、持続可能な前処理への統合的戦略を提言。

English

This review compares conventional and emerging cotton scouring technologies (enzymatic, ultrasound, plasma, supercritical CO2, nanotechnology) on efficiency, environmental impact, and cost. It finds trade-offs: enzymatic reduces COD but is slow, scCO2 is near-waterless but capital-intensive. Barriers include cost and brand inertia, but EU policies like Digital Product Passport are driving adoption. The paper calls for integrated technical, economic, and regulatory strategies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の繊維産業は環境規制とサプライチェーン対応が課題。本レビューは排水処理コスト削減やScope3排出削減に資する技術選択の基礎資料となる。特に、サステナビリティ開示が進む中、繊維企業が採用可能な具体的な技術オプションを提供。

In the global GX context

This review contributes to global textile sustainability by benchmarking emerging scouring technologies against environmental and economic metrics. It aligns with EU regulatory trends (Industrial Emissions Directive, Digital Product Passport) and offers actionable data for companies facing CSRD disclosure requirements and supply chain pressure to reduce water and chemical footprints.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for evaluating textile pretreatment technologies, useful for further LCA and cost-benefit studies.

🏢実務担当者:Offers concrete options for reducing water and chemical use in textile processing, with ROI estimates for enzymatic and ultrasound methods.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights policy drivers like EU directives that can accelerate adoption of cleaner technologies, informing regulatory design.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Cotton scouring, a critical pretreatment in textile wet processing, has historically relied on alkaline methods that consume 10–20 L of water per kilogram of fabric and generate effluents with chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 2000–3500 mg/L, often exceeding sustainability thresholds. This review evaluates conventional and emerging scouring technologies with respect to technical efficiency, environmental performance, and economic viability. Based on the reviewed data, the enzymatic scouring reduces COD to 300–600 mg/L and < 3% fiber strength loss, though with longer processing times (90–120 min). Ultrasound-assisted methods shorten treatment to 20–40 min and achieve 85–90% wax removal, while plasma scouring reduces water use to 1–2 L/kg and achieves effluents < 100 mg/L COD. Supercritical CO₂ (scCO₂) enables near waterless operation with < 1% fiber strength loss but requires capital costs of USD 200,000–500,000. Nanotechnology-based scouring achieves 85–90% impurity removal with COD 200–400 mg/L while cutting surfactant use by up to 45%. Economic analysis shows alkaline scouring remains cheapest ($0.50–1.20/kg), whereas enzymatic and ultrasound methods achieve 2–4-year return on investment (ROI), and scCO₂ adoption is largely confined to high-margin markets. Barriers include high capital intensity, operational complexity, and cultural resistance, as 87% of global brands still specify alkaline-scoured fabrics. However, policy drivers such as the EU Industrial Emissions Directive and Digital Product Passport (2026) are catalyzing the adoption of emerging scouring techniques. Looking ahead, microbial scouring, lab-grown cotton, and blockchain traceability could render scouring near zero-impact by 2035. This synthesis underscores the urgent need for integrated technical, economic, and regulatory strategies to advance sustainable textile pretreatment globally.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。