ロシア・ウクライナ戦争下における欧州のエネルギー・レジリエンス：レジリエンスの言説的構築と持続可能な転換への示唆
European energy resilience in the face of the Russo-Ukrainian war: Discursive constructions of resilience and implications for sustainability transitions (原題)
Tamara Soltys, Iris Wanzenböck
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2022年のロシアによるウクライナ侵攻に伴うエネルギー危機下で、EUメディアが「エネルギー・レジリエンス」をいかに言説的に構築したかを分析する。適応型レジリエンス（将来の転換を約束）、現状維持を強化する抵抗型レジリエンス、原子力・再エネの技術的サブナラティブを識別。適応型が支配的で、脆弱性・リスクの枠組みが危機対応と転換経路の正当化に決定的役割を果たすことを示す。
English
This study analyzes how EU media discursively constructed 'energy resilience' during the 2022 energy crisis triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. It identifies resilience-as-adaptation (promising future transformation), resilience-as-resistance (reinforcing the status quo), and technology-focused sub-narratives on nuclear and renewables. Resilience-as-adaptation dominated, shaped by EU policy actors, with vulnerability and risk framings legitimizing particular crisis responses and transition pathways.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はエネルギー自給率が低く、地政学リスク下での安定供給とGXの両立が喫緊の課題。本稿は危機時にレジリエンス言説が転換政策を先送りしうる点を示し、日本のエネルギー安全保障とGX政策の設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Amid geopolitical shocks, this paper shows how resilience framings can legitimize incremental adaptation while deferring structural transformation—directly relevant to global debates on balancing energy security with decarbonization under TCFD/ISSB transition planning.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:レジリエンスと転換ガバナンスの言説的・時間的枠組みに関する理論的貢献を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:地政学リスク下でのエネルギー調達・事業継続計画において、短期適応と長期転換のバランスを再考する材料となる。
🏛政策担当者:危機対応時にレジリエンス言説が構造的転換を遅延させうる点を踏まえ、政策設計で長期視点を明示的に組み込む必要性を示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines how energy resilience was discursively constructed in EU media debates during the energy crisis triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and explores the implications of these constructions for Europe's sustainable energy transition. Existing research has primarily focused on energy security concerns, policy shifts and changing transition priorities following the Russo-Ukrainian war. Building on this literature, we adopt a constructivist and discourse-theoretical perspective on resilience to examine how crises shape transition governance through competing interpretations of vulnerabilities, risks and appropriate system responses across different temporal horizons. Drawing on EU media coverage from the first three years of the crisis, the analysis identifies several interpretations of energy resilience: Resilience as immediate systemic adaptation with a promise of future transformation; resilience as systemic resistance reinforcing the status quo; and technology-focused sub-narratives, problematizing the resilience of nuclear and renewable energy systems. Among these, resilience-as-adaptation emerged as the dominant framing, largely shaped by EU-level policy actors. We further show that vulnerability and risk framings play a critical role in legitimising particular crisis response strategies and transition pathways. While narrow framings tend to justify resilience in terms of incremental adaptation, broader framings support calls for transformation. Finally, regime actors frequently articulate resilience in temporal terms, emphasising short- to medium-term adaptation while deferring structural transformation to the long term. Overall, the findings contribute to resilience debates by demonstrating how temporal framings of crisis and transformation shape which transition pathways and governance responses become politically legitimate during geopolitical crises.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104933first seen 2026-09-10 04:36:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。