インドネシア・西スマトラにおける協働型ブルーカーボン管理のガバナンス課題とステークホルダーの準備状況
Governance Challenges and Stakeholder Readiness for Collaborative Blue Carbon Management in West Sumatra, Indonesia (原題)
Rahmat Irfansyah, Effin Martiana, Dominikus Yoeli Wilson Laia
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドネシア西スマトラのブルーカーボン管理をめぐり、政府・企業・NGO・地域団体など25名のステークホルダーを対象に混合手法調査を実施。最大の課題はKKPRL発行後の環境義務の不明確さで、空間データ不足や調整の弱さも挙がった。一方で協働意欲は高く、制度的能力とのギャップが示唆された。
English
A mixed-methods survey of 25 stakeholders in West Sumatra, Indonesia, examines governance challenges for collaborative blue carbon management. The top challenge was unclear environmental obligations after KKPRL issuance, followed by limited spatial data and weak coordination. Stakeholders showed high willingness to collaborate, revealing a gap between readiness and institutional capacity.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもブルーカーボン（藻場・干潟）はJ-クレジットや生物多様性保全の文脈で注目されるが、本論文は自治体・省庁間の調整や情報共有の仕組みづくりという実務的論点を提供する。
In the global GX context
Blue carbon sits at the intersection of biodiversity and climate disclosure (TNFD, nature-related risk). This paper's focus on institutional coordination gaps offers a governance lens relevant to nature-capital and marine ecosystem accounting debates globally.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:ブルーカーボン・沿岸ガバナンス研究における協働準備性と制度的能力の乖離という分析枠組みを参考にできる。
🏢実務担当者:海洋・沿岸分野でステークホルダー連携や情報共有の仕組みを設計する際の課題整理に有用。
🏛政策担当者:海洋空間計画と環境義務の明確化、省庁横断の調整メカニズム整備の必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Effective blue carbon management requires coordination across institutions, sectors, and stakeholder groups, yet fragmented governance can constrain collaborative action. This study explores perceived governance challenges and stakeholder readiness for collaborative blue carbon management in West Sumatra, Indonesia. An exploratory mixed-methods approach was applied using a short online questionnaire distributed to stakeholders engaged with the Marine Spatial Planning Agency of Padang (BPRL Padang). Twenty-five respondents from government, state-owned enterprises, the private sector, academia, NGOs, and community groups participated. Quantitative responses were analysed descriptively, while open-ended responses were examined using thematic coding. The highest-rated governance challenge was the need for greater clarification of environmental obligations following the issuance of KKPRL, followed by limited spatial data and information on blue carbon ecosystems and weak stakeholder coordination. Institutional coordination and integration also emerged as the most frequently identified theme in open-ended responses. Despite these challenges, respondents demonstrated strong recognition of the need for greater inter-agency collaboration and high stated willingness to support joint rehabilitation or restoration activities, participate in collaborative forums, and share relevant data and information. These findings suggest a potential gap between collaborative readiness and collaborative capacity where participating stakeholders appear willing to collaborate, while institutional mechanisms may remain insufficient to translate this willingness into sustained collective action. Strengthening blue carbon governance may therefore require greater attention to coordination mechanisms, information sharing, institutional clarity, and long-term collaborative arrangements.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doaj.org/article/92f98a900aaa4548a7bfabef4e1242e0first seen 2026-11-14 05:09:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。