Synergistic effects of green building policies on urban water resource management: A case study of typical low-carbon cities in China and Bangkok, Thailand
グリーンビルディング政策が都市水資源管理に及ぼす相乗効果：中国の低炭素都市とタイ・バンコクの事例研究 (AI 翻訳)
Qingli Zhou, Kritsakon Pongraktham, Tanakorn Wongwuttanasatian
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、中国とタイのグリーンビルディング政策の違いが水・エネルギー相乗効果に与える影響を、政策テキスト分析、パネルデータ回帰、事例比較により分析した。深圳と上海長寧区では強制的な政策が再生水利用と省エネを促進し、バンコクの自主的政策より効果的だった。2018〜2023年に深圳の再生水利用率は28%から45%に向上し、バンコクの15%から22%を上回った。政策の強制力、一貫性、技術適応性の違いが要因である。
English
This study analyzes how differences in green building policies between China and Thailand affect water-energy synergies, using policy text analysis, panel data regression, and case comparisons. Compulsory policies in Shenzhen and Shanghai's Changning District were more effective than Bangkok's voluntary policies in promoting reclaimed water use and conservation. From 2018 to 2023, Shenzhen's reclaimed water utilization rate rose from 28% to 45%, outperforming Bangkok's 15% to 22%. Differences in institutional strength, policy coherence, and technology adaptability explain the outcomes.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策では、グリーンビルディングや水資源管理は脱炭素と資源循環の両面で重要。本研究成果は、政策の強制力とインセンティブ設計の効果を示し、日本の自治体や企業が水・エネルギー統合管理を進める際の参考となる。
In the global GX context
This study provides empirical evidence on how policy design (compulsory vs. voluntary) affects water-energy synergies in green buildings, relevant to global discussions on urban sustainability and climate action. It offers insights for cities implementing green building codes and water management strategies, complementing TCFD/ISSB frameworks by highlighting resource efficiency.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides comparative empirical evidence on policy effectiveness for water-energy synergy in green buildings.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for designing green building policies and water management strategies in urban development.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of compulsory policies and cross-border collaboration for achieving low-carbon city goals.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Under the double pressure of global climate change and urbanization, green building “water-energy synergy” has become a key link for low-carbon city governance. To address the significant difference between Chinese and Thai green building policies, this study focuses on the effects of policy differences on synergies. By combining policy text analysis, panel data regression analysis, and case comparison, the study was conducted in Shenzhen, Changning District in Shanghai, and Bangkok in Thailand. The results show that China's compulsory policies (plus economic incentives) are much better than Thailand's voluntary policies to promote the utilization of reclaimed water as well as the conservation of water and energy. Between 2018 and 2023, Shenzhen recorded a markedly stronger improvement in water-energy performance than Bangkok. The reclaimed water utilization rate in Shenzhen increased from 28% to 45%, equivalent to an average annual increase of 3.4%, whereas the corresponding increase in Bangkok was from 15% to 22%, or 1.4% /year. Over the same period, water-treatment energy consumption decreased more substantially in the Chinese case than in the Bangkok case. The differences can be attributed to three aspects: institutional strength, policy coherence, and technology adaptability. This research suggests that China should strengthen collaboration between departments and regions, while Thailand should strengthen policy restraint and adapt local technology. At the same time, we should set up a Sino-Thai cross-border policy and technology sharing mechanism in order to provide a practical reference for the collaborative management of green buildings worldwide.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671201007/pdffirst seen 2026-05-22 04:44:17 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:12:34
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。