大規模水力発電の影響評価：ブラジル・ベロモンテの事例
Impact assessment of large hydropower: the case of Belo Monte in Brazil (原題)
Rodrigo A. da Silva Pimentel, Lígia M. Costa Pinto, Paula Ferreira
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ブラジル・パラ州のベロモンテ水力発電所を対象に、文献レビュー、環境影響評価（EIA）分析、32件のステークホルダー・インタビューを統合し、環境・社会・経済的影響を多次元の外部性フレームで評価した研究。漁業減少、社会動態の変化、暴力増加、雇用創出など複雑な相互作用をIRaMuTeQによるテキスト分析で抽出し、意思決定への地域参加の必要性を強調する。大規模水力の持続可能性とアマゾンの公正なエネルギー移行に関する議論に実務的示唆を与える。
English
This study integrates literature review, EIA analysis, and 32 stakeholder interviews to assess environmental, social, and economic externalities of Brazil's Belo Monte hydropower plant using a multidimensional framework. Textual analysis via IRaMuTeQ identifies key impacts—reduced fishing, shifting social dynamics, increased violence, job creation—and stresses greater community participation in energy decision-making. It advances debates on large hydropower sustainability and just energy transitions in the Amazon, offering practical insights for licensing and participatory governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では大規模水力の新規開発は限定的だが、再エネ拡大に伴う地域合意形成や環境アセス、公正移行の議論は日本のGX政策・住民対話の設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Adds a Global South, stakeholder-grounded perspective to just-transition and environmental-licensing debates that increasingly inform ISSB/CSRD social-disclosure expectations and transition-finance safeguards for large renewable projects.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:多次元外部性フレームと混合手法による大規模再エネの社会影響評価の実例として参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:大規模再エネ案件の住民対話・補償設計・社会的リスク管理の実務的教訓を得られる。
🏛政策担当者:環境ライセンス制度と参加型ガバナンスの改善に向けた政策示唆を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract The expansion of renewable energy sources, particularly hydropower plants, is essential for Brazil’s energy planning. However, large projects like the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Plant (HPP) in Pará, located in a sensitive Amazonian biome with numerous indigenous lands and traditional communities, have raised significant environmental and social concerns, often exacerbating social inequalities. This article presents an integrated approach to analyse the externalities perceived by stakeholders regarding the construction and operation of Belo Monte HPP. The research combines literature review, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) analysis and stakeholder interviews to investigate the environmental, social and economic impacts of the project through a multidimensional externalities framework. It examines complex interactions surrounding Belo Monte, including reduced fishing, changes in social dynamics, increased violence, job creation and economic strengthening. A qualitative study with 32 interviews, with representatives of various social groups, addresses the dimensions of sustainability, the challenges observed, the main benefits and the potential actions to mitigate the impacts and strengthen the positive results. Using textual analysis, supported by IRaMuTeQ software, the study identifies key externalities and underscores the need for greater community participation in energy-related decision-making. By systematically connecting the evidence from interviews, EIA documents and recent literature, the article advances current debates on the sustainability of large hydropower projects and on just energy transitions in the Amazon, providing practical insights to improve environmental licensing, compensation measures and participatory governance in Brazil’s electricity sector.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-026-08191-7first seen 2026-11-06 04:37:26
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。