リチウムイオン電池セルの製品カーボンフットプリントとライフサイクルコストの決定要因：技術・地理・規制・予見にわたる最先端レビュー
Determinants of Product Carbon Footprint and Life Cycle Costing in Lithium-Ion Battery Cells: A State-of-the-Art Review Across Technology, Geography, Regulation, and Foresight (原題)
Valentin Mussehl, Hannah Rotthoff, Tom Marschke, Julius Bildstein, Merlin Frank, Achim Kampker, Jana Gerta Backes
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
EU電池規則によりLIBセルのPCF算定が法的義務化される中、PCFとLCCの決定要因を技術・サプライチェーン地理・規制・予見の4軸で整理したレビュー。13件の査読研究を評価行列で評価した結果、両指標と4決定要因を統合的に定量モデル化した研究は存在せず、地理・技術・規制は記述的に扱われる傾向が示された。動的で再現可能な統合評価の方法論的フロンティアと研究アジェンダを提示する。
English
With the EU Battery Regulation mandating product carbon footprint (PCF) quantification for LIB cells, this review maps determinants of PCF and life cycle costing (LCC) across technology, supply-chain geography, regulation, and foresight. Appraising 13 peer-reviewed studies (2017–2026) against a structured matrix, it finds no study jointly integrates both indicators with all four determinants; geography, technology trajectories, and regulation are mostly described rather than modeled. The paper defines the methodological frontier and an agenda for dynamic, reproducible, integrated PCF–LCC assessment of battery supply chains.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
EU電池規則のPCF義務化は、日本企業が欧州向けに電池・EVを供給する際のデータ整備・サプライチェーン開示の実務に直結する。SSBJやScope3算定の高度化を進める日本企業にとって、PCFとLCCを統合する評価枠組みの設計指針として参考になる。
In the global GX context
The EU Battery Regulation (2023/1542) turns PCF into a legal disclosure requirement, making this review directly relevant to global battery and EV supply chains facing CBAM-style carbon accounting. It highlights that current LCA/LCC practice lags regulatory ambition, an important gap for ISSB/CSRD-aligned product-level disclosure.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:PCFとLCCを技術・地理・規制・予見の4軸で統合する動的評価手法の研究ギャップとアジェンダを把握できる。
🏢実務担当者:EU電池規則対応のPCF算定とLCC評価を設計する際、静的なスナップショット手法の限界と統合評価の必要性を理解できる。
🏛政策担当者:電池の炭素排出量規制を設計する際、地理・技術・規制要因を動的に組み込む評価枠組みの重要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are a cornerstone technology for decarbonizing transport and stationary energy storage, and the EU Battery Regulation (2023/1542) now makes quantifying their product carbon footprint (PCF) a legal obligation. Yet the environmental and economic performance of LIB cells is not intrinsic to the technology: it depends on cell chemistry and format, component quality, raw material and production locations, and regulatory context. While the technical evolution of cells is documented dynamically, life cycle assessment (LCA/PCF) and life cycle costing (LCC) studies largely treat these determinants as static snapshots, risking biased, backward-looking results that may mislead investment and policy decisions. This paper addresses that gap through a State-of-the-Art-review of the key determinants of LIB cell PCF and LCC along four dimensions: technology, supply-chain geography, regulation, and foresight. The boundaries were defined as cradle-to-gate, with a functional unit of 1 kWh of produced cell capacity. Using a documented Boolean search in Web of Science and Scopus, 13 peer-reviewed studies (2017–2026) were identified and appraised against a structured evaluation matrix. No study jointly integrates both indicators (PCF/LCA and LCC) with all four determinants coherently; production geography, technological trajectories, and regulatory instruments are typically invoked descriptively rather than modeled quantitatively. The publication defines the methodological frontier and outlines an agenda for dynamic, reproducible, and integrated PCF–LCC-technology-quality assessment of battery supply chains.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su182111069first seen 2026-11-01 05:04:12 · last seen 2026-11-06 05:00:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。