開示・検証・価値：気候リスク開示が機関投資家のオンサイト調査と経済的帰結に与える影響
Disclosure, Verification, and Value: The Impact of Climate Risk Disclosure on Institutional On‐Site Research and Economic Consequences (原題)
Shan Tang, C. Ding, Abdullahi D. Ahmed
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国A株企業を対象に、高品質な気候リスク開示が機関投資家のオンサイト調査の頻度と深度を高めることを実証。評判補償効果と情報誘導効果が経路であり、移行リスク開示が特に有効。さらに、調査が環境投資・市場評価・投資家構成を改善することを示す。
English
Using Chinese A-share firms, this study shows high-quality climate risk disclosure increases institutional on-site research frequency and depth. Mechanism analysis reveals reputational compensation and information guidance effects, with transition risk disclosure being more influential. The induced research promotes environmental investment, market valuation, and investor structure.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示が始まり、投資家との対話が重要視される中、開示の質が機関投資家の調査行動に与える影響を示す本研究成果は、企業の開示戦略やIR活動に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This study provides empirical evidence linking climate disclosure quality to investor engagement, relevant for global frameworks like ISSB and CSRD. It underscores the role of institutional research as a verification mechanism, offering insights for regulators and companies on the value of transparent climate risk reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:気候リスク開示の経済的帰結と機関投資家の検証メカニズムに関する新たな実証的知見。
🏢実務担当者:開示戦略の改善が投資家エンゲージメントと企業価値向上につながる可能性を示唆。
🏛政策担当者:開示基準の設計が投資家の情報処理と資本配分に影響することを示し、規制強化の根拠を提供。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Based on signaling theory and information asymmetry theory, this study uses a sample of Chinese A share listed firms from 2012 to 2023 to examine the effect of climate risk disclosure (CRD) on institutional on‐site research and its economic consequences. The results show that high‐quality CRD significantly increases both the frequency and the depth of institutional research. This conclusion remains robust after a series of endogeneity tests. The mechanism analysis indicates that CRD promotes institutional research through two channels: a reputational compensation effect and an information guidance effect. The heterogeneity analysis further shows that these effects are more pronounced among firms with greater ESG rating divergence, firms facing stronger EP, and firms with a lower proportion of female executives. Moreover, the effect mainly stems from the disclosure of transition risks rather than physical risks. Further analysis reveals that the institutional research induced by CRD can ultimately promote corporate environmental investment, enhance market valuation, and improve investor structure. Overall, this study integrates signaling theory and information asymmetry theory into a unified analytical framework of disclosure, verification, and value. It highlights the theoretical role of institutional research as the core verification mechanism and provides practical implications for corporate disclosure strategies, investor due diligence, and regulatory standard setting.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71469first seen 2026-09-08 05:25:12 · last seen 2026-09-22 05:14:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。