エネルギー安全保障の再考：分断化する世界秩序における地政学・経済・気候変動
Rethinking Energy Security: Geopolitics, Economics and Climate Change in a Fragmenting World Order (原題)
Khwaja Danish Hameed
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、エネルギー安全保障の概念が単なる資源アクセスから、経済安定・戦略的自律・技術力・インフラ防護・気候持続可能性を含む多次元的なものへと変容したと論じる。ウクライナ戦争、中東不安定、重要鉱物競争を例に、エネルギーが市場商品から国家が影響力を行使する戦略資源へ移行したと指摘。再生可能エネルギーへの移行も地政学的競争を新たな領域（重要鉱物・技術・製造能力・サプライチェーン）へ移すだけだと主張する。
English
This paper argues that energy security has shifted from narrow resource access to a multidimensional concept spanning economic stability, strategic autonomy, technological capability, infrastructure protection and climate sustainability. Using the Ukraine war, Middle East instability and critical-minerals competition, it contends energy is now a strategic resource states wield for influence. The renewable transition does not remove geopolitics but relocates rivalry to critical minerals, technology, manufacturing and supply chains.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はエネルギー自給率が低く、重要鉱物・LNG・再生可能エネルギー調達の地政学リスクに直面する。本論文の多次元的枠組みは、経済安全保障政策や企業の調達戦略・移行計画の背景整理に資する。
In the global GX context
Amid ISSB/TCFD-driven transition planning, this paper reframes energy security as inseparable from climate and geopolitics, relevant to how firms and governments assess transition risk, strategic autonomy and critical-mineral supply chains in a fragmenting order.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー安全保障を経済・地政学・気候の統合枠組みで捉える理論的視座を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:調達・サプライチェーン戦略において地政学リスクと気候移行リスクを統合的に評価する視点を与える。
🏛政策担当者:経済安全保障と気候政策を切り離さず設計する必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Through most of the last century, "energy security" carried a fairly narrow meaning: whether a country could obtain enough oil, gas or electricity, at a price it could bear, without serious interruption. That framing has worn thin. Armed conflict, sanctions regimes, rivalry among major powers, fractured supply chains and a warming climate have together pulled energy questions much closer to the centre of international security debates. Russia's war in Ukraine, continuing instability across the Middle East, and intensifying competition over critical minerals all point in the same direction: energy markets are now bound tightly to foreign policy, national security and economic resilience. This paper follows how the meaning of energy security has shifted, examined through three lenses economics, geopolitics and climate change. Its central argument is that energy is no longer simply a commodity traded on international markets. It has become a strategic resource that states use to project influence, manage their exposure to risk and pursue their own interests. Moving toward renewable energy does not take geopolitics out of the equation; it arguably opens new fronts of competition, over critical minerals, technology, manufacturing capacity and the supply chains linking them together. Drawing on realism, geopolitical economy and securitisation theory, the paper develops a multidimensional reading of energy security — one that extends beyond simple access to energy and takes in economic stability, strategic autonomy, technological capability, infrastructure protection and climate sustainability. Understood this way, the emerging energy order looks less like an end to geopolitical rivalry and more like its migration into new terrain.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.24113/wbtd6827first seen 2026-09-16 04:35:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。