← 論文一覧に戻る

Carbon Budget Compliance: A life-cycle-based model for carbon emissions of automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers

炭素予算適合:自動車OEMのCO2排出に関するライフサイクルベースのモデル (AI 翻訳)

Mara Neef

TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt)ジャーナル2020-01-01#炭素会計Origin: EU経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: automotive
DOI: 10.25534/tuprints-00013243
原典: https://doi.org/10.25534/tuprints-00013243
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は自動車OEM向けに、企業全体の絶対排出量を将来予測し、炭素予算への適合を評価するライフサイクルベースの手法(CBC法)を開発した。フォルクスワーゲンを対象に、バッテリー生産と電動車利用時の再生可能エネルギー利用の効果を、自家用車とモビリティサービス(カーシェア、ライドヘイリング、ライドプーリング)のフリートで分析。結果、炭素予算超過を最小5%に抑えるには、即時の対策実施と再エネ調達が不可欠であることを示した。

English

This study develops the Carbon Budget Compliance (CBC) method, a life-cycle-based model for automotive OEMs to forecast absolute CO2 emissions and assess carbon budget alignment. Applied to Volkswagen, it analyzes the leverage of renewable energy in battery production and EV use phase across private and mobility service fleets, showing that immediate implementation of these measures is crucial, with the lowest modeled overshoot at 5%. The method enables OEMs to build holistic carbon reduction strategies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の自動車産業は脱炭素移行の最重要セクターであり、SSBJ開示やScope 3対応が急務。本手法はOEM全体の絶対排出量を予測し、対策効果を統合的に評価できるため、日本企業の移行計画策定や投資家向け開示に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, this paper supports ISSB/SBTi-aligned transition planning by providing a company-level absolute emissions model. It integrates life-cycle thinking with mobility services, which is critical as automakers face increasing pressure to align with Paris Agreement budgets and disclose robust transition plans under regimes like CSRD and SEC climate rules.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a novel methodology for company-level carbon budget compliance that can be adapted and validated across industries.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical tool for sustainability teams to model the impact of fleet electrification and renewable energy sourcing on absolute emissions.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the role of renewable energy infrastructure and the need for OEMs to actively engage in energy sector decarbonization to meet national climate targets.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) cause considerable amounts of CO2 emissions over the life cycle of their vehicles. They are thus contributing to global climate change. To stop climate change, all industries, including OEMs, must accomplish a major reduction of CO2 emissions. OEMs report past emissions and receive external support for setting Paris Agreement-compatible reduction targets. Though currently, OEMs do not have access to a methodology that facilitates modelling their future absolute emissions and the leverage of reduction measures at the company level. They are thus unable to develop holistic carbon reduction strategies. Here I demonstrate that current carbon management approaches remain conceptual. Based on the analysis of OEMs’ future emission drivers, requirements are developed to evaluate additional methods for their applicability in the subsequent method derivation. Quantifying the effect of integrating mobility services in OEMs’ fleets on the company’s absolute emissions is evaluated as especially important. For this reason, the Carbon Budget Compliance (CBC) method is developed by integrating and refining the analysed approaches. This method facilitates computing the impact of single reduction measures on fleet level over the life cycle of vehicles and mobility services regarding compliance with a carbon budget. The CBC method is exemplarily applied in a case study for the Volkswagen Group (VW). In scenario analyses the leverage of using renewable energy sources for battery production and electrified vehicles’ use phase is computed for fleets consisting of private vehicles and mobility services (car sharing, ride hailing, ride pooling). VW’s absolute emissions between 2015 and 2050 are modelled regarding the compliance with a 2 °C-compatible carbon budget. I show that immediate operationalisation of the two reduction measures for private vehicle and mobility service fleets is crucial for budget compliance. Due to higher load factors, ride hailing and pooling vehicles provide more person-km (p-km) during their lifetime than private vehicles. Fleet sizes in these scenarios are thus reduced. As heavier ride pooling vehicles need higher battery capacities than average Group vehicles, ensuring the use of renewable energy sources over their life cycle is crucial to attain absolute emission reduction. Otherwise, the reductive effect of smaller fleets is counterbalanced. The load factor of car sharing vehicles is similar or equal to private vehicles. By offering car sharing, OEMs can thus only reduce absolute emissions via an earlier onset of fleet electrification and the use of renewable energy sources. The high dependence on the energy sector’s decarbonisation efforts calls for OEMs to play an active role in the provision of sufficient amounts of renewable energy. The lowest modelled overshoot of the carbon budget is 5% facilitated by a combination of ride hailing and private vehicles as well as by operationalising the reduction measures. OEMs should therefore analyse additional measures tackling the supply chain and less CO2-intensive emission categories such as logistics within the CBC method. The method facilitates modelling such measures due to its modular approach. By using the CBC method, OEMs are now able to develop effective carbon reduction strategies to support achieving global climate targets and monitor their success. To improve the CBC method, future research should address the automation of data flows between data systems and the integration of micro-scale mobility models to quantify rebound effects caused by mobility services. Coupling internal carbon pricing with the CBC method could further promote its applicability in OEMs’ daily business operations.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。