再生可能エネルギー移行における倫理的緊張：イノベーションサイクル、世代間正義、責任ある廃棄の道徳的要請に関する哲学的考察
Ethical tensions in renewable energy transitions: a philosophical examination of innovation cycles, intergenerational justice, and the moral imperative of responsible decommissioning (原題)
Huang Qunchao
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、再生可能エネルギー技術の急速なイノベーションがもたらす廃棄物問題とシステム脆弱性を倫理的観点から考察する。ハンス・ヨナスの責任原理やロールズの正義論を援用し、将来世代への負担転嫁を防ぐ「境界付き加速」の必要性を論じる。SDGsとの関連も示し、廃棄・リサイクルを含むライフサイクル全体でのガバナンスを提唱する。
English
This conceptual paper examines ethical tensions in renewable energy transitions, focusing on end-of-life material risks from PV, wind blades, and batteries. Drawing on Jonas, Rawls, and Gardiner, it argues for 'bounded acceleration' linking deployment, design, repairability, and recycling to ensure intergenerational justice. It reframes decommissioning as a multi-actor governance challenge aligned with SDGs.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、再生可能エネルギーの大量導入に伴い、太陽光パネルや風力タービンの廃棄問題が顕在化している。本論文の「境界付き加速」の概念は、日本のFIT制度下での廃棄物管理や循環経済政策に示唆を与える。また、SSBJ開示においても、サプライチェーン全体の環境負荷を考慮する視点として参考になる。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to the discourse on just transition and circular economy, complementing ISSB/CSRD disclosure requirements that increasingly expect companies to address end-of-life impacts. It offers a normative framework for policymakers balancing rapid deployment with long-term sustainability, relevant to EU's Critical Raw Materials Act and similar initiatives.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a philosophical framework for integrating ethics into energy transition research, useful for scholars studying sustainability governance.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of life-cycle thinking and responsible decommissioning in corporate sustainability strategies, potentially informing product design and take-back programs.
🏛政策担当者:Offers a moral rationale for regulations on renewable energy waste management and extended producer responsibility, relevant for shaping national circular economy policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Accelerated innovation in renewable energy technologies drives the energy transition, but it can also intensify end-of-life material risks and expose the transition to a form of systemic fragility. This conceptual paper examines those ethical tensions across photovoltaic modules, wind-turbine blades, and lithium-ion batteries. It advances a normative argument grounded in Hans Jonas’s imperative of responsibility, Rawls’s just savings principle, Gardiner’s “perfect moral storm,” and Science and Technology Studies critiques of technological determinism. It further conceptualizes resilience as the capacity of the renewable-energy material–institutional system to anticipate, absorb, adapt to, and transform in response to technology turnover, resource constraints, and decommissioning pressures without shifting uncompensated ecological burdens to future generations or marginalized communities. The paper therefore connects responsible decommissioning to the 2030 Agenda’s integrated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDGs 7, 9, 12, 13, and 17, and reframes governance as a multi-actor sustainability transition rather than a voluntary manufacturer response. It concludes that bounded acceleration—linking deployment, design, repairability, take-back, recycling, public information, and accountability across the life cycle—is a moral and institutional condition of a just and resilient energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1920143first seen 2026-08-20 04:50:07
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。